Skip to comments.
Supreme Court orders Maine House to restore vote of censured lawmaker
WGME ^
| 5/20/25
| Matthew Bourgault,
Posted on 05/20/2025 12:07:45 PM PDT by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
SCOTUS rules in favor of Rep Libby.
Court's decision here:
Libby decision
Of course Sotomayor and Jackson dissented.
1
posted on
05/20/2025 12:07:45 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: CottonBall; spacejunkie2001; Bshaw; ptsal; 11th_VA; Reno89519; newfreep; frogjerk; OneVike; ...
2
posted on
05/20/2025 12:09:25 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: CFW
IIRC, the picture had already beem posted in the media, and she used it to condemn what was going on. The imported RAT MassHoles in the Maine legislature went totally apeshit on her for condemning it. They used the pic as an excuse to censure her, but the real reason was that she publicly came out against that BS..
Good for her. Glad she won.....
3
posted on
05/20/2025 12:13:29 PM PDT
by
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
To: lgjhn23
The Court’s Order:
The application for injunction pending appeal presented to JUSTICE JACKSON and by her referred to the Court is granted pending disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR would deny the application.
JUSTICE JACKSON, dissenting from the grant of the application for injunction.
I would deny the application.
The remainder of the 5 page document is Jackson’s dissent.
4
posted on
05/20/2025 12:22:14 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: CFW
Amy Conehead surprises.....
5
posted on
05/20/2025 12:22:18 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(YMMV)
To: CFW
6
posted on
05/20/2025 12:23:55 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(YMMV)
To: CFW
7
posted on
05/20/2025 12:28:01 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>) )
To: CFW
Did 化炭寺 write the dissent herself, did her aide write it, did ChatGPT write it? Inquiring minds want to know...
(化炭寺 is Ketanji in Japanese, sounds like a Buddhist temple)
8
posted on
05/20/2025 12:30:27 PM PDT
by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: CFW
This is only temporary relief pending appeal.
I would doubt that the representative will be successful in that appeal.
If Maine’s constitution is like the US Constitution it grants the houses of the legislature to be the judges of their members.
9
posted on
05/20/2025 12:32:24 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: CFW
when she publicly identified them it fixed it.
10
posted on
05/20/2025 12:59:56 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: CFW
“Of course Sotomayor and Jackson dissented.”
I forget.
Which one is the wide Latino?
To: CFW
why is Supreme Court deciding a state matter?
12
posted on
05/20/2025 1:03:42 PM PDT
by
b4me
(Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
To: jeffersondem
sonia sotomayor is the wide latina
13
posted on
05/20/2025 1:12:40 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: Pontiac
“I would doubt that the representative will be successful in that appeal. If Maine's constitution is like the US Constitution it grants the houses of the legislature to be the judges of their members.”
It is not that clear cut. See the excerpt from the Wiki Adam Clayton Powell entry.
The House refused to seat Powell and the Supreme Court eventually overruled the House action.
From Wiki:
“The full House refused to seat him until the completion of the investigation. Powell urged his supporters to “keep the faith, baby,” while the investigation was underway. On March 1, the House voted 307 to 116 to exclude him, despite the recommendation of the Select Committee. Powell said, “On this day, the day of March, in my opinion, is the end of the United States of America as the land of the free and the home of the brave.”[39]
“Powell won the Special Election to fill the vacancy caused by his exclusion, receiving 86% of the vote.[40] But he did not take his seat, as he was filing a separate suit. He sued in Powell v. McCormack to retain his seat. In November 1968, Powell was re-elected. On January 3, 1969, he was seated as a member of the 91st Congress, but he was fined $25,000 and denied seniority.[41] In June 1969, in Powell v. McCormack, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the House had acted unconstitutionally when it excluded Powell, as he had been duly elected by his constituents.[42]”
I think you are thinking about the real U.S. Constitution - not the synthetic one imposed after the disaster at Appomattox.
To: CFW
Of course Sotomayor and Jackson dissented.Not Kagan?
To: CFW
Maine’s attorney general filed new paperwork both in district court and with the Supreme Court, saying Libby put the child's safety at risk when she publicly identified them. That is the biggest line of BS going, but it sure doesn't stop them from using it.
16
posted on
05/20/2025 1:34:17 PM PDT
by
metmom
( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.")
To: lgjhn23
Mass is a cancer in this country.
17
posted on
05/20/2025 1:35:05 PM PDT
by
metmom
( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.")
To: Pontiac
If Maine’s constitution is like the US Constitution it grants the houses of the legislature to be the judges of their members.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees a republican form of government for the several states. I would argue that if a censured member cannot vote on legislation, the body is no longer truly republican. You can shut her up, but the vote has to be counted.
18
posted on
05/20/2025 1:35:14 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: CFW
Maine’s attorney general filed new paperwork both in district court and with the Supreme Court, saying Libby put the child's safety at risk when she publicly identified them. No, those "adults" who told the child to embrace denial of their gender and deny the reality of biology put the child at risk...and continue to do so.
To: jeffersondem
I think you are thinking about the real U.S. Constitution - not the synthetic one imposed after the disaster at Appomattox. Perhaps you are correct.
The USSC ruled unconstitutionally as they have no power to impose any action on the Congress.
20
posted on
05/20/2025 2:09:29 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson