Posted on 05/01/2025 7:20:34 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Is there a way to get this from an ethics violation to a criminal violation? For instance, do judges have to certify that they have no conflict of interest when they take a case? If so, that would be perjury and obstruction of justice on the part of this judge (and other judges such as Boasberg). Prosecutable crimes.
Bleah. In CA it’s up to the crooks to police themselves. As if any judicial ethics board would require integrity of anybody on the democrat plantation.
Ugh.
“””U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, a Biden nominee, issued an injunction on Tuesday barring Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the Eastern District of California from stopping illegal aliens without a warrant or proving that the person is a threat to flee before they can get a warrant.””””
1. Notice that judge’s injunction only applies to California.
2. Let all of the BLUE states issue similar injunctions.
3. Then let all of the RED states put out the word that any illegal in a RED state is subject to deportation.
4. Then all of the RED state illegals will flee to BLUE states and the RED state citizens will be safe and secure while the BLUE state citizens will be forced to put iron bars on their windows and doors to protect themselves from the illegal alien criminals.
“Laura Loomer has done an excellent job of vetting these criminals in black robes.”
Yes she has...
she got Loomered...
You terms are acceptable.
I’ll withhold my enthusiasm until I see it somewhere other than GP.
They must ignore this “judge”. By his logic no cop could arrest anyone.
Traitor Roberts allows District Judge Grift?
Who knew?
Put her gritty posterior behind bars for 20 years.
Every state has a big city
Every big city has democrat govt.
Seems all these judges are dirty one way or other.
Thereby converting a few more blue states to red. I like it
The judge is a she.
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, a Biden nominee, issued an injunction on Tuesday barring Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the Eastern District of California from stopping illegal aliens without a warrant or proving that the person is a threat to flee before they can get a warrant.
This GP "reporting" was bullshit the first time and it is still bullshit. The judge did not bar CBP "from stopping illegal aliens without a warrant or proving that the person is a threat to flee before they can get a warrant." She cited federal statute law and ordered them to comply with that existing statute law.
8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2)
https://law.justia.com/codes/us/title-8/chapter-12/subchapter-ii/part-ix/sec-1357/
U.S. Code
Title 8 - Aliens and Nationality
Chapter 12 - Immigration and Nationality
Subchapter II - Immigration
Part IX - Miscellaneous
Sec. 1357 - Powers of immigration officers and employees§1357. Powers of immigration officers and employees
(a) Powers without warrant
Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—
[...]
(2) to arrest any alien who in his presence or view is entering or attempting to enter the United States in violation of any law or regulation made in pursuance of law regulating the admission, exclusion, expulsion, or removal of aliens, or to arrest any alien in the United States, if he has reason to believe that the alien so arrested is in the United States in violation of any such law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest, but the alien arrested shall be taken without unnecessary delay for examination before an officer of the Service having authority to examine aliens as to their right to enter or remain in the United States;
You are correct. Which means her injunction was a useless copy&paste of Federal law which is undoubtedly a well known protocol within BP taught and re-taught to agents by their superiors.
However, requiring BP to give this “judge” monthly piles of paperwork describing their every interaction with every person they detain is not prescribed in Federal law and I doubt that it is under her authority to demand it.
I’m telling you, these women judges are looking for the meat wagon deals daily. I ain’t wrong.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.