Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thingumbob

Well, the shooter had already taken away two guns, so he might have reasonably assumed that the invader was unarmed and unlikely to use deadly force. He might have been better off if he had shot the other two since they hadn’t had any firearms removed from their persons yet.


7 posted on 04/12/2025 9:00:26 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

In Texas you can shoot people for a lot of reasons, and I think one of them might be home invasion.


8 posted on 04/12/2025 10:31:48 AM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

I should add - “armed or not”.


9 posted on 04/12/2025 10:32:49 AM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson