Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2025 9:16:19 PM PST by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fluorescence

Another Trump backstabber.

....In her ruling, Cannon said there had not been such a request, and suggested that the members of Congress could not be trusted not to share the contents of the report publicly.....

Congress should not take this insult. They should move forward with impeachment articles


2 posted on 01/21/2025 9:20:09 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Man made Climate Change is Real. Cal. Officials responsible for the fires just proved it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

As with Trump’s taxes, “Leak” in 3, 2,

And yes, our yellow “Press” WILL publish.


3 posted on 01/21/2025 9:24:01 PM PST by Ex gun maker. (Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV group-think!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence
A federal judge on Tuesday barred the Justice Department from sharing former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the classified documents case against Donald Trump with members of Congress.

And why does Cannon want to withhold this report? Cause there's nothing in it. Smith had no case from the get go. Releasing it would only embarrass the dems.

4 posted on 01/21/2025 9:24:05 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Man made Climate Change is Real. Cal. Officials responsible for the fires just proved it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

The Trump DOJ should follow the lead of Biden’s Department of Injustice and leak this report.


5 posted on 01/21/2025 9:25:08 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Man made Climate Change is Real. Cal. Officials responsible for the fires just proved it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Taking a couple of replies here, and smashing them together. I predict the report will somehow leak to the press, and since it’s “out there” congress can then read it, and they will harp on details from it for the next 2 years.


6 posted on 01/21/2025 9:36:21 PM PST by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Judge Aileen


7 posted on 01/21/2025 9:59:50 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence
This is why President Trump issued an Executive Order for data retention within agencies like this. When the rats say it was deleted while under an Executive Order not to, guess what.

Trumps DOJ can thoroughly investigate just as the previous DOJ would on changeover, and do what the Biden DOJ did to make their lives H*LL. However, with Trump, I suspect he will declassify and release to the public the evidence of what was done and let the public weigh in on it when the Judicial and Press rats back up the deletor(s) illegal actions.

9 posted on 01/21/2025 11:13:23 PM PST by CptnObvious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence
The Federal judge should have said that it would be a prejudiced action against the defendant (Trump) and possibly slanderous to do so release it to the public.

The judge is correct, to cite that only the committee heads of the proper congressional venue using proper procedures would be able to see the documents.

10 posted on 01/21/2025 11:28:09 PM PST by CptnObvious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Misleading headline?

“...while an appeal involving Trump’s co-defendants in the case is still pending.”


11 posted on 01/22/2025 2:43:32 AM PST by McGruff (Trump: Joe Biden will go down in history as the worst president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

Release it. Let’s hear the story. Then release the a real report on the Biden’s.


12 posted on 01/22/2025 3:38:48 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fluorescence

There’s still plenty of Garland underlings in the department that have a copy of it and will leak it to the NYT or WP.


15 posted on 01/22/2025 2:24:43 PM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson