To: Oldeconomybuyer
Just the thought of President Trump is enough to make one think twice . . . Smith, James and Merchand,
2 posted on
11/13/2024 6:54:17 AM PST by
knarf
(Candice Owens, Personmal advisor)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Of course judges have their own political views, but are at least supposed to NEVER speak out on political issues. Putting it in writing, even to other judges = too stupid to serve
3 posted on
11/13/2024 7:07:15 AM PST by
j.havenfarm
(23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Judge overseeing 'fake elector' case recuses himself after defense accuses him of anti-Trump biasFake "fake elector" case.
4 posted on
11/13/2024 7:17:35 AM PST by
FreeReign
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Next up: investigation and federal prosecution of Kris Mayes for corruption and civil rights violations against Trump electors.
5 posted on
11/13/2024 7:21:59 AM PST by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I’m sure Mark Davis’ response to Letitia James was heard by these guys re: conspiracy against rights.
6 posted on
11/13/2024 7:27:41 AM PST by
Tench_Coxe
(The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Odd, no mention of the court the judge presides in. You would think that would be important enough to be listed when the judge was identified in the article.
7 posted on
11/13/2024 7:37:48 AM PST by
TheDon
(Resist the usurpers! Remember the J6 political prisoners!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
That means his “problem” was about to be exposed.
8 posted on
11/13/2024 8:13:29 AM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Black guy upon receiving a MAGA hat: "Murica!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson