Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Why should we even care what this washed-up harridan has to say?

But, beyond that, her immediate instinct is to destroy another Constitutional protection. That's notable in and of itself.

1 posted on 10/09/2024 7:16:43 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

Private citizen Hillary should go back to vacations


2 posted on 10/09/2024 7:18:39 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I’m sure brilliant Kamala Harris will have something to say about this.


3 posted on 10/09/2024 7:19:44 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

“The law is vital for allowing free speech to flourish online, because without it companies would have a strong incentive to suppress much more user-generated content.”

Right now they have it both ways. They have full editorial control and act as government censors, AND they are protected from lawsuits.
Maybe with all their child porn, revenge porn, etc... they SHOULD have no more protection than a magazine editor.
And then there is the fact that they steal creator content all they want and claim it wasn’t them because they are not editors.

They lost the right to 230 protection when they started being editors and had FBI agents sitting in their offices.


4 posted on 10/09/2024 7:24:47 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

“Section 230 is why Facebook isn’t liable if someone uses its messaging system to set up a drug deal”

Maybe they -should- be. Almost immediately they can identify and add their “fact check” or block it if someone who posts something against the Covid vaccine, something about the stolen 2020 election, election humor, etc.

Yet somehow, child porn, dope deals, human trafficking just elude them. Hell Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Mullahs had Facebook pages when Trump was banned.

I wouldn’t mind seeing Facebook getting sued when the next tranny or islamic terrorist shoots up a place and had a long Facebook presence in a “trannies fight back” or a Hamas homepage.


5 posted on 10/09/2024 7:34:15 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

It’ll be 77 in a few days.


6 posted on 10/09/2024 7:42:48 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
With all the angst about Section 230 I've seen from conservatives, it is very interesting to see the direction flip all they way to the fascist left, bitching that these companies haven't drilled their opposition into the ground sufficiently. There does need to be a remedy for the latitude these companies enjoy to manage their content editorially, thus suppressing the right, but to do so would demand a degree of honest thoughtfulness and vision one cannot rightly expect of Congress.

Crappy situation.

7 posted on 10/09/2024 8:02:58 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I actually agree that Sec. 230, as its been interpreted, needs to be repealed and replaced. It’s nothing but a shield and sword for BigTech to use to corrupt the system and allow cancel mob attacks on innocent people.


10 posted on 10/09/2024 8:12:37 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

What are wearing today Hillary? Is it a pink pantsuit to match your purty pink panties? Or is it totally commie red instead of just socialist pink? Asking for a friend who happens to be an active member of the “basket of deplorables”.


12 posted on 10/09/2024 8:22:17 AM PDT by kawhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Why should we even care what this washed-up harridan has to say?

Because there are powerful forces within the Democratic Party who she is in contact with. Think of her as a window into Schumer's mind. Schumer is nothing, if not clever and scheming. Nothing could be better for the health of the Democratic Party than effectively shutting down the internet. If she had her druthers, Jim Rob would have been hit with a multimillion dollar law suit the minute anyone on this forum mentioned Monica Lewinsky. Regardless of the merits of the suit, it would be crippling. Free Republic could not exist if they get their way.

13 posted on 10/09/2024 9:35:09 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (לעזאזל עם חמאס)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

If section 230 is repealed, Free Republic will cease to exist along with many other conservative websites. This is why they want to repeal it.


15 posted on 10/09/2024 11:06:00 AM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson