Screenshot of Ali ‘Yado’ Yakub’s donations in 2020 to the Lincoln Project / IMAGE: FEC.gov
Posted on 09/23/2024 8:12:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The husband of one of the two moderators in next week’s CBS News debate featuring vice presidential candidates J.D. Vance and Tim Walz appears to have made two donations of $250 apiece to the controversial Lincoln Project during the 2020 election.
Records from the Federal Election Commission show that Ali “Yado” Yakub, the husband of Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan, contributed on July 2 and Sept. 26 of that year to the anti-Trump super-PAC.
Screenshot of Ali ‘Yado’ Yakub’s donations in 2020 to the Lincoln Project / IMAGE: FEC.gov
Voting records confirmed that the address listed was the residence of Yakub, who was registered as a Republican, and Brennan, who was registered as an independent.
Many have observed that registration offers no indication about political preference, with Democrats during the recent primary—in which President Joe Biden ran largely uncontested—frequently changing their party identification to vote against Trump.
Yakub also made contributions to ActBlue in 2019, including two that were earmarked for the primary campaign of future Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
Headline USA reached out to both Brennan and Yakub by phone and email but received no response.
The Lincoln Project—founded by high-profile NeverTrump ex-Republicans Rick Wilson, George T. Conway III, Steve Schmidt, Reed Galen, John Weaver and Jennifer Horn—initially appeared to be a sort of principled response by members of the GOP establishment to Trump’s takeover of the party.
However, it quickly became clear that some of its members were growing increasingly unhinged with Trump Derangement Syndrome.
The group lost all credibility when, in January 2021, allegations emerged that co-founder John Weaver had engaged in sexual impropriety with young, male staffers and had allegedly solicited boys as young as 14.
The bombshell led to an exodus of the group’s more influential figures, such as former John McCain campaign chief Steve Schmidt, who had become a registered Democrat the month prior.
Only two of its charter members—Rick Wilson and Reed Galen—are currently associated with the group, which has grown more radical and outlandish, notoriously engaging in a stunt in which it staged a fake neo-Nazi rally and attempted to blame Trump supporters.
It also has run ads pushing blatant disinformation, such as attempting to suggest that Trump would monitor and arrest people for attempting to obtain an abortion. Trump has repeatedly emphasized that the issue is now at the state level and will remain so if he is re-elected, while noting that he personally favors exceptions for abortions in a set of specific, narrowly tailored circumstances.
Moreover, the Lincoln Project has sought to falsely tie Trump to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which he has repeatedly disavowed and denied any association with. The project launched in April 2023, well before Trump was the presumptive nominee, and was designed as a series of policy proposals for use by whichever candidate prevailed.
It is unclear whether Yakub’s donations would violate any CBS newsroom ethical policies, many of which would likely apply only to Brennan herself.
However, CBS News, like many mainstream media outlets, recently amplified attacks on Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito that suggested the conservative jurist should recuse himself from Trump-related cases due to his wife’s decision to display Revolutionary War-era flags that have been associated with Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement.
Consequently, the network may have created at least the reasonable perception of bias by its own standard, particularly if Brennan’s moderation is believed to favor Walz over Vance in the Oct. 1 matchup.
The revelation of Brennan’s indirect ties to the Lincoln Project via Yakub comes amid lingering sensitivities about moderator bias following reports that ABC News may have colluded with the Kamala Harris campaign in the Sept. 10 presidential debate.
A whistleblower affidavit alleged that the network agreed to give Harris access to question topics, avoid certain questions and unilaterally “fact check” the statements—many of them verifiably true—of former President Donald Trump.
Breaking – Here is the ABC whistleblower affidavit stating how ABC arranged a bias, anti-Trump debate. There are several pages after the verification page that were specifics about the job the whistleblower did and a transcript of the recordings he had made.
pic.twitter.com/JM9vvXbxok
— Thera (@Tamor12) September 15, 2024
The Senate has pledged to investigate the allegations.
“The American people deserve transparency and accountability from the mainstream media and full accounting of whether ABC News coordinated with the Harris campaign to skew the debate’s questions and fact-checking in favor of the Vice President,” Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, wrote in a letter to the network and the Harris campaign last week.
Like Disney-owned ABC, CBS’s top leadership has been revealed to be loaded with Democrat donors.
The network has been notorious for its bias in years past, prominently was the subject of Bernard Goldberg’s 2002 book Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, reflecting on his 30-year career at the network.
Goldberg declined to speculate on the prospect of bias in the upcoming debate in a text-message to Headline USA.
“Predictions are hard — especially when they’re about the future,” he wrote. “Yogi [Berra] said that.”
He likewise deferred in commenting on the current level of bias at his old network.
“Been away from cbs news for a very long time and would have no valuable insight,” he wrote.
Another prominent CBS News alumna and well-known media-bias critic, Sharyl Attkisson, was slightly less reluctant.
“I don’t watch CBS and honestly have no idea about the culture! Almost everybody I knew is gone,” she told Headline USA via text message.
However, based on her continuing work in the field, she was able to venture her own belief that the ABC whistleblower was correct in saying corporate influences had impacted journalistic integrity over the past decade.
“I suspect you are correct,” she wrote. “There was a sea change in 2015 time period in which media fairness and accuracy devolved faster than any previous time I know of.”
Attkisson resigned in 2014 from the network and proceeded to write the best-selling book Stonewalled about her fight against “obstruction, intimidation and harassment” during the Obama era.
At the time, the president of CBS News was David Rhodes, who was the brother of leading Obama White House propagandist Ben Rhodes.
She has continued to chronicle the decline of American journalism in two series on her website: “Media Mistakes in the Era of Trump” and “Media Mistakes in the Era of Biden.”
fixed it
Vance should call out the moderators right at the start, then proceed as a rational debater.
Excellent news.
Cancel the debate. This is more than adequate reason.
I can see Vance doing that. He already does that after his stump speeches when he asks for several questions from the reporters.
One went something like this.
“Well that’s a stupid question, and I’ve heard it exactly like you asked. Why don’t you come up with your own questions? But - I’ll answer it. Whether the people eating cats and dogs rumors are true - although to my congressional office there have been people calling with first-hand reports - regardless of that, why don’t you, the media go to Springfield and report on the conditions there?
I don’t know if you’ll find roasted cats, but you will see crowded hospitals and schools. Adding 20,000 illegal Haitians to a town of 60,000 will do that. HIV and TB have sky-rocketed. Along with rents, car crashes, car insurance, etc...”
Doesn’t matter.. Vance will wipe the floor with that giant tampon.
Waltz > normal unlikability
Why are the moderators always rabid left wing democrats?
Lets have debate moderators that are right wing republicans to balance everything out
True. Add to that the fact that Vance is proving to be quite a deadly opponent for the fake news media. Judging by the dozen-or-so exchanges I’ve seen, it is 12-0 Vance whenever he takes questions from the media - which is all the time.
He fearlessly invites questions at every campaign stop, and when they predictably attempt to deliver a “gotcha” - he deftly turns it around on them - slicing and dicing - exposing their lies - at the same time managing to use the opportunity to redirect and get some important element of the MAGA message out.
I have been VERY impressed with how cleverly he handles the press, who, after all, will be his real opponents in the debate.
This debate is going to be a massacre and there won’t even be a wokeness factor to save tampon Tim - he’s just another straight white male.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.