I don’t know that the Thomas concurrence questioned the motivations of Smith, but it does represent a huge flashing warning on the issue of the legality of his appointment.
[...but it does represent a huge flashing warning on the issue of the legality of his appointment.
Thomas raised the issue with brass knuckles, stating, “A private citizen cannot prosecute another private citizen, much less a former president.”
Here are my questions, if they rule that Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, how is Trump made whole? What is his restitution? What are the punitive damages?
These scumbags rifled through his wife’s underwear drawer and his son’s bedroom. There should be absolute hell to pay.
Agree. The appointment makes little sense to me.