Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned

“...expanded the definition of presidential powers and narrowed the scope of Trump’s D.C. election interference trial.”

Huh? I didn’t see that ANYWHERE in the decision.

Lefturds making crap up, again.


2 posted on 07/02/2024 5:17:42 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PubliusMM

Expanded presidential powers... Bullcr-p!


3 posted on 07/02/2024 5:36:28 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: PubliusMM
"Huh? I didn’t see that ANYWHERE in the decision."

Thomas wrote a concurring opinion in which he questioned the legality of Smith's appointment. It was Roberts who wrote the majority opinion. Made no mention of Smith's appointment.

8 posted on 07/02/2024 6:32:24 AM PDT by LIConFem (DOJ's new motto: Fair is foul, and foul is fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: PubliusMM

Disregard my last reply Misread your post.


10 posted on 07/02/2024 6:34:36 AM PDT by LIConFem (DOJ's new motto: Fair is foul, and foul is fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson