I would think this means that Barrett does not have the First Amendment cases.
See? Court watchers guess wrong just as often as everyone else.
The government argued that the six-year statute of limitations had already passed and Corner Post could not challenge the rule, but the court today holds that because Corner Post filed its challenge within six years of when it was injured by the rule, its challenge was not barred by the statute of limitations.
Justice Barrett started her announcement with a joke about how this case was not one that we were here to hear.
Justice Jackson calls the “flawed reasoning and far-reaching results of the Court’s ruling in this case” “staggering.”
She writes that “there is effectively no longer any limitations period for lawsuits that challenge agency regulations on their face.”
IMHO, Jackson is too ignorant to be on the Court.
quote “there is effectively no longer any limitations period for lawsuits that challenge agency regulations on their face”
sweet! another blow to the deep state!
Well? We’re waiting.
for the 10 am decisions.
THIS AND CHRVRON ARE BEGINING TO REIGN IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.
Sweet
Truly- an ingnoramus. Who could not describe what a Woman is- and she presumably is a woman. Her answer could have been that- but, no, she said she wasn’t a biologist! Idjit, and chicken as well.
Now this— “no longer any limitations period for cases against agencies” when, in the case covered the very limitation was central to the decision. Truly, a moron- like a lot who do not realize future consequences of their actions. Psychologists have written reams on this topic- all called racist.
100% agree