Agree and thanks.
Although I think the Dems will continue the lawfare.
Justice Thomas’ concurrence in Trump v. U.S. is hugely significant. He questions whether Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office is constitutional.
“If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President.”
The dems may continue to try to pursue their lawfare, as well as their other usual tricks, but my admittedly non-lawyer impression from the decisions handed down over the past two days is that while the Court was only clarifying the obvious meaning of the Constitution, it effectively handed us an entire arsenal of legal weapons to now use against the deep state. The federal government has slid so far left that constitutional government seems radical to the left. Well, they’d better get ready for an avalanche of “radical” Americanism.