Posted on 07/01/2024 6:33:16 AM PDT by CFW
The Supreme Court will be issuing Opinions at 10:00 a.m. this morning for the October 2023 term. You can read the opinions released thus far at Supreme Court opinions.
The attorneys at scotusblog will be liveblogging the release of opinions from the pressroom.
There are four cases remaining undecided for the October 2023 term.
October sitting: All opinions have been released;
November sitting: All opinions have been released;
December sitting: All opinions have been released;
January sitting: All opinions have been released.
February sitting: There are three cases pending.
Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (an Administrative Procedure Act issue), and the two First Amendment cases. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton.
March sitting: All opinions have been released.
And then there is the case we are all waiting for from the...
April setting: There is one case remaining undecided.
Which is the case of Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
Issue(s): Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
Opinion days are fun but nerve-racking. Join the fun, post your comments and insights here at the thread, and, say a prayer for the Justices!
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
My point was not on the merits of that case, or the lack thereof, but pointing out that nothing in that case could fall under official presidential acts, and so is not implicated by the immunity decision.
I was golfing this morning as this all came out. But, THIS is my GO TO site to see what happened. Thanks much for your input.
If you have a Ping list, please add me.
How could ANYONE disagree with this ruling?
100% agree
No it does not. Cases remanded to be fleshed out. Furthermore, they need take out Smith, pronto per Thomas. If not, he will reconfigure a new indictment. This guy is Ahab on steroids.
There’s s/t in the SCOTUS Immunity ruling that says that courts cannot judge the intent of Presidential actions, based on assumptions or hypotheticals.
So, to me, that means that if Trump calls Ga and asks if they can “find 10,000 votes,” then that is not evidence that Trump called Ga and asked for 10,000 illegal votes.
Well, I thought I was going to be correct on the three liberal women, but was not. They thought the ruling would only be used by Trump. I guess they don’t think it can happen to their own people.
But Democrats keep passing stupid laws and then scream when the laws are used against them.
Sean Davis on X:
SCOTUS: You can’t just throw your rival in prison because you don’t like him.
DEMOCRATS: So you’re saying we can drop bombs on him?
SCOTUS: You really can’t even charge your rival with a crime because his presidency made you mad.
DEMOCRATS: Got it. So we can incinerate his house with him in it?
SCOTUS: The Constitution protects officials from being terrorized with lawfare for official actions they undertook while in office.
DEMOCRATS: Ah. Makes sense. So we can officially assassinate everyone we don’t like?
SCOTUS: Prosecuting a politician because you don’t like his politics would destroy our country, and we’re not going to allow it.
DEMOCRATS: Roger that. So what you’re saying is: we are officially allowed to eliminate Trump and the Supreme Court as long as we, like, say it’s official and stuff?
” Impeachment charges” against the SCOTUS?? what on earth???
LOL Now that would be hilarious and an appropriate barbed wire enema for the Dems and their legal and media attack dogs.
Zen Master has repeatedly said the following:
1) No trial in any of the fed/insurrection/docs cases before the election.
2) After Trump wins, most would just be dismissed, as the Trump DoJ would dismiss charges anyway.
3) NY Marchon is an idiot, will likely sentence Trump to jail; Trump appeals; no jail during appeal.
4) Zen Master says the NY case not subject to the immunity stuff.
5) Trump does not go to jail because NY appeals or, if necessary, fed courts step in.
Now, Robert Barnes last night said something different, namely the immunity DOES affect NY because the “crime” for which he is being charged (bookkeeping) took place in 2017, after he was president, and thus is covered.
Trump’s attorneys agree, filing today to overturn.
Barnes said Cannon is meticulous and she will probably carry on with a lot of motions, etc. that will fully expose Count Dooku.
BTTT!
RPOTUS’ latest Truth ...
TOTAL EXONERATION! It is clear that the Supreme Court’s Brilliantly Written and Historic Decision ENDS all of Crooked Joe Biden’s Witch Hunts against me, including the WHITE HOUSE AND DOJ INSPIRED CIVIL HOAXES in New York. All of these Unfair Charges represent the WORST level of Election Interference ever seen in our Country’s long and storied History. It must be understood, that I was Totally and Completely Innocent from the beginning of this Giant and Highly Illegal Scam, long before the Supreme Court’s Decision was released. The impact of the Immunity Ruling is a loud and clear signal for Justice in the United States. I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.