Posted on 07/01/2024 6:33:16 AM PDT by CFW
The Supreme Court will be issuing Opinions at 10:00 a.m. this morning for the October 2023 term. You can read the opinions released thus far at Supreme Court opinions.
The attorneys at scotusblog will be liveblogging the release of opinions from the pressroom.
There are four cases remaining undecided for the October 2023 term.
October sitting: All opinions have been released;
November sitting: All opinions have been released;
December sitting: All opinions have been released;
January sitting: All opinions have been released.
February sitting: There are three cases pending.
Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (an Administrative Procedure Act issue), and the two First Amendment cases. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, and NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton.
March sitting: All opinions have been released.
And then there is the case we are all waiting for from the...
April setting: There is one case remaining undecided.
Which is the case of Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
Issue(s): Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
Opinion days are fun but nerve-racking. Join the fun, post your comments and insights here at the thread, and, say a prayer for the Justices!
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...
The VP's powers of "presiding" over the certification of electors is deeply ambiguous.
Trump may have examined whether the states could have sent alternate electors, but at the time of the certification he was only talking to Pence about delaying certification. Hardly a crime, and quite possibly also an official act.
“So, does that complete all pending cases?”
It does. The Court will have what’s called a “clean-up conference” this afternoon I believe. That’s where they dispose of minor lingering matters before the Court. That finalizes this term of Court.
If you want to see the cases they have already agreed to hear for next term (October 2024 term), you can go here:
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/terms/ot2024/
This not the final list as more will be added over the next few months.
Most likely from a bot farm in a foreign country paid by Democrats.
They are pathetically stupid and do not understand separation of powers and checks and balances.
The Supreme Court ruling on case they don’t like is perfect lawful and follows the Constitution.
“What’s this mean for Bannon? I’m assuming the conversation he was being sopeanad for was covered by immunity.”
IMHO, Bannon should have had executive immunity. I believe what happened is at first he refused to testify because he felt he had executive privilege, and once Trump released him from “executive privilege” he agreed to testify, but the committee refused to reschedule his testimony and continued with the prosecution for contempt.
But, SCOTUS refused to take up his case, so off to prison he goes.
Agree and thanks.
Although I think the Dems will continue the lawfare.
Funny. You see same on Facebook praising Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau. They're all foreign bots praising the "Dear Leader".
No idea ... I don’t watch Faux.
My pleasure, FRiend!
There needs to be an emergency Emergency Injunction. He’s speaking, from in front of the prison area, now.
“Stop wasting Court’s time...” is not a legal demand.
Their ideology is “the ends justify the means”; nothing will stop them from trying to prevent a Trump Presidency...as we witnessed last time around.
Justice Thomas’ concurrence in Trump v. U.S. is hugely significant. He questions whether Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office is constitutional.
“If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President.”
Their ideology is “the ends justify the means”; nothing will stop them from trying to prevent a Trump Presidency...as we witnessed last time around.
Yes ... the old Van Jones/Cloward Piven mantra.
Hopefully, their facade is completely, and, crumbling with DIVINE righteousness!
The remands are to DC courts and involve their analyzing facts and whether these charges involved inner or outer official acts or unofficial acts. That is such a low bar for anti-trump dc courts to overcome.
Justice Thomas’s concurrence seems to invite Trump’s team to appeal to scotus the illegal appointment of a private citizen to a special counsel position. Hopefully, that is immediate or already filed.
From what?
Melt Downs as Dems wake up!
Cryin Chuckie Schumer call the ‘MAGA” Justices a Disgrace!
As sick and pathetic as that impeachment was, it was, at least, impeachment, rather than sending in the cops and trying to put President Trump in prison.
They aren't waking up, they are woke up. The one thing they haven't awoken to is that they are about to lose in November in a historic landslide. Biden has dementia and is incapable of holding office.
Excellent
Ty for your work here
;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.