So much hyperbole in this article. The liberals are clutching their pearls, but the Chevron Doctrine was effectively dead well before the Supreme Court pull the plug on the life support machine. I’m a lawyer and work for my state enforcing regulatory laws and rules. I do not believe any case has actually been decided in favor of the government by use of the Chevron Doctrine in several years. It sure hasn’t happened here in Oklahoma and I haven’t run across any recent federal cases upheld because of it. So the notion that this will curtail federal rule making is likely wrong. They will remain undaunted in their efforts to rule by fiat. The liberal media is once again fear mongering.
“So the notion that this will curtail federal rule making is likely wrong. “
My state attorney has challenged illegal bureaucrat diktats several times.
I expect that states challenging illegal bureaucrat laws will increase. State attorneys general have banded together to challenge arbitrary diktats from the ATF. I expect the trend to continue and grow larger.
26 Republican attorneys general sue to block Biden rule requiring background checks at gun shows
https://apnews.com/article/biden-gun-show-background-checks-lawsuit-25b1d7eb7711939e73bee89838f4c318
I am not qualified to argue, I’m only an engineer and businessman, with you but you are swimming against the current of some major legal minds and my considerable experience against regulatory activism and administrative law. Chevron opened the flood gates of regulation writing and made most resistance futile. Most of my nearly 50 year career was covered by Chevron. It was as prevalent in business as SOX has been since Enron.