Election Interference: Google Search Results Favor Joe Biden, Bury Donald Trump’s Campaign Site

https://www.breitbart.com/ ^ | 6/27/2024 | LUCAS NOLAN

[bitt]

Google is up to its regular election tricks, according to the Media Research Center. An MRC investigation found that when searching for a candidates name with “presidential race 2024,” Joe Biden’s campaign website is the top result, while Donald Trump’s campaign website doesn’t appear on the first page.

The MRC reports that as the 2024 presidential race heats up, concerns are growing about the role of technology giants in shaping public opinion and access to information. A recent investigation MRC has uncovered what they claim to be evidence of bias in Google’s search results, potentially impacting the visibility of presidential candidates’ campaign websites.

The MRC’s research, conducted just days before tonight’s highly anticipated presidential debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, revealed stark differences in how Google presents search results for various candidates. When searching for a candidate’s name along with “presidential race 2024,” researchers found that President Biden’s campaign website appeared as the top result, while former President Trump’s website was notably absent from the first page of results.

This discrepancy has led to accusations of election interference. MRC President Brent Bozell stated, “Google is blatantly interfering in the 2024 election.” The organization’s findings suggest that the issue extends beyond just these two candidates, with pro-life candidates seemingly receiving less favorable treatment in search rankings.

[Brown Deer]

Nonsense! People do search for me, and house painters aren’t spending money on google. Why LIE about it?

The fact is, Google is biased in it’s results.

https://nypost.com/2024/02/23/business/google-news-bias-skewed-even-further-left-in-2023-63-from-liberal-media-sources-only-6-from-the-right-analysis/

[NetAddicted]

Why is operation Mockingbird included as an FR keyword on this article?

[palmer]

I found mostly the same thing: both Google and DuckDuckGo favor NYT, CNN, 538, and other establishment-controlled sites. I added each candidates name in front of presidential race 2024 and there was no real difference in results, unlike what the article claims.

The problem is that they all censor anyone who doesn't adhere to the narratives. That's easy to hide in the algorithms, just make sure all highest weighting is directed towards establishment sources. Some of that is simply a circle jerk (they link to each other). But there are an infinite number of more devious ways to do that e.g. using opaque woke AI.

[ptsal]

Bkmk

[palmer]

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-matt-taibbi Matt Taibi explains why here, around 1:35 why search results all point to "authority" (Project Owl) to suppress the counter-narrative.