Posted on 03/14/2024 8:14:53 AM PDT by bitt
Twenty-three Democrat run states and the District of Columbia, the home of our nation’s capital, filed amicus briefs in support of government censorship and banning of free speech in the United States.
These 23 states and the District of Columbia filed amicus briefs in support of the Biden administration in the SCOTUS case is Murthy, et al v. Missouri, et al, 23-411 (Missouri v. Biden) case.
The states essentially argue that they have an interest in collaborating with tech companies to “encourage” the public to behave themselves and “discourage” the public from believing alleged “disinformation” or engaging in online predatory behavior. The clear message is that they believe that the government has the right to shut down and censor speech.
The list of un-American states that support government censorship include:
New York Colorado Arizona California Connecticut Vermont, Washington, Washington, D.C. Wisconsin New Jersey New Mexico, Oregon Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada
HOWEVER, a number of courageous states filed an Amicus Curiae brief in SUPPORT of Gateway Pundit and the Free Speech Respondents. These (16) heroic states include:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
My Revolutionary War ancestors are spinning...
The POTATUS isn’t accumulating power.
The people who installed him are.
When a federal law mentions “President” we don’t even know who is telling him what to do.
I agree.
But then while Deep State doesn’t hire the front office appearance types for brains, the people hiding behind them are not stupid, are they.
compared to FJB, no, but that’s not saying much.
Watch This (12 min.) ! ! ! !
Mary Holland And Mike Davis Detail The Censorship Case In The Supreme Court
bttt
The free exchange of ideas being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to publicly speak, publish, worship, peaceably assemble, and petition the government for a redress of grievances shall not be abridged.Would this have changed anything?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.