[SeekAndFind]

Seems like a credible pattern to any reasonable juror to consider actually, and once the facts and discovery are out on Trump’s case, it’s possible that even a stacked jury would rule to acquit Trump.

Smith can’t take that chance. He’s a fanatic with a political agenda, so now he’s wheeling out the Alice in Wonderland tactics, going Soviet. This explains the extremism of his tactics, his insistence on winning despite having a case that is steadily falling apart.

That’s despite his having a favorable judge, a friendly jury, a stacked court district brimming with Washington swamp things, and an unlimited federal budget.

This isn’t a valid appointment, which is supposed to be about justice. This is about a political show trial — of the party, by the party, for the party, and nothing outside the party, as the Bolsheviks in various ways used to say.

Smith is showing himself an outrageous practitioner of show trials, and sentence first, trial later. He’s the ultimate kangaroo court king, deciding what each side is going to say.

It’s time for Congress or the courts to declare his appointment illegal and throw this clown out.

[bray]

Democracy = Communist Fascism

[healy61]

Jack Smith is the trier of facts. No? He thinks he is.

[bitt]

p

[Alberta's Child]

Is it even legally possible for a court to determine that law enforcement personnel at the scene of an alleged crime have “no probative value?”

How does a prosecutor even keep his license to practice law when he makes such an outlandish claim?

[AnthonySoprano]

.
He’s denying Trump arguing Defense after Defense, as I said he would.

And the Jamaican Judge is egging Smith on.

Like his daughter’s diary, Biden ordered the Raids.

[Sicon]

Or if it has to be, the voters will decide on Election Day.

Oh? Like in 2020?

If Showalter thinks we can vote our way out of this madness, she hasn’t been paying attention.

[DeplorablePaul]

Recall that the FBI enticed the kidnapping of Whitmer in Mi? Seems to be in their playbook to encourage a political crime.

https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/08/11/whitmer-kidnap-trial-jury-rogue-fbi-informants/10296330002/

[rodguy911]

Do you mean this Jack Smith?

https://scnr.com/article/whistleblower-complaint-says-special-prosecutor-jack-smith-involved-in-international-extortion-scheme_af9f965a99c311ee9c930242ac1c0002

Whistleblower Complaint Says Special Prosecutor Jack Smith Involved In International Extortion Scheme

Whistleblower Complaint Says Special Prosecutor Jack Smith Involved In International Extortion Scheme The allegations stem from a complaint submitted to the DOJ by former DEA employee John Francis Moynihan.

John Francis Moynihan, a former employee of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), submitted an expansive, 118-page complaint through his attorney to Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz, detailing numerous allegations of criminal activity allegedly committed by Smith prior to his appointment as the special prosecutor in two cases against former President Donald Trump.

The document is an official sworn statement provided to the DOJ under penalty of perjury.

Moynihan informs Horowitz that he has 35 years' experience investigating complex international money laundering cases, and continues to assist the DOJ and Treasury Department with ongoing cases, before outlining in the complaint a vast web of corruption overseen by Smith who allegedly abused the power of his office.

Witnesses who provided sworn affidavits say that Smith ran “an alleged extortion ring set up within the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, a European Union initiative ratified by Kosovo’s parliament in 2016 to prosecute war crimes."

Smith is named as “an active participant in a scheme that extorted millions of dollars from wealthy individuals targeted for investigation and/or prosecution by the Kosovo Specialist Prosecutor's Office (SPO). Smith served as the Specialist Prosecutor from May 7, 2018, to November 18, 2022, at which time he was appointed by U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to serve as the Special Counsel” to investigate Trump.

Evidence provided to the Inspector General's Office includes recorded interviews and various written communications, including text messages.

Among the key players named in the affidavits accompanying the whistleblower complaint are:

*David Harback, a DOJ prosecutor currently serving on Smith's team investigating Trump. Harbach worked for Smith from 2019 to November 2021.

*Alan Tieger, former U.S. prosecutor and current SPO prosecutor.

*Hillary Clinton, former U.S. Secretary of State and New York Senator.

*David Schwendiman, former U.S. prosecutor who served as Chief Specialist Prosecutor at the SPO between September 2016 and March 2018.

*Faik Imeri, who represented himself as working with Smith and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

*President Hashim Thaci, former Kosovo president indicted for war crimes by the SPO in 2020.

*Charles Mcgonigal, former FBI Special Agent in charge of counterintelligence at the New York field office.

*Florim Alan, currently under indictment in Kosovo for breaking into computer systems.

*Russian Oligarchs Vladimir Potanin and Michail Prochorov

[Beowulf9]

Jack Smoth’s whole prosecution is based on news reports and partisan fact finding by Pelosi, not an honest, independent investigation. Trump still was president on Jan 6 before federal certification, which should not have occurred in certain states before proper hearing of evidence about lawbreaking and cheating.
Smith has stated that there was fraud in the election “but not enough to change the outcome” as if his team actually did an independent, thorough and fair investigation, which they did NOT, eg, what about Zuckerbribes and mail in ballots that never went through the mail but got illegal postmarkets at election headquarters? or unconstitutional mail in voting in WI, or illegal mail in voting in PA?

[sauropod]

Review

[Oystir]

A motion in limine is a pretrial motion requesting the court to prohibit or allow certain evidence on matters said to be highly prejudicial or inadmissible. It is made before a jury has been selected and discussed outside the presence of the jury. It is common in criminal cases.

[ridesthemiles]

Does Smith know his way to Fort Marcy Park???