Sidney Powell is not an election law expert. But she was one of the few who were willing to step forward when there was huge professional pressure to not represent Trump.
They needed election law experts who also understood the nature of the computer systems and databases being used.
There is indisputable evidence of system manipulation including:
- mass changes in ballot type from “in-person” to mail at 4am the day after.
- underage voting (my guess they made temporary chages in the date of election to process those votes)
Well, I thought the evidence of tampering was overwhelming, myself. What caught my eye was the 1-2 am massive reversals-of-fortunes in the counts of every state that stopped counting at 10 pm. Same curve, in 5 states. Unfortunately, it’s exceptionally difficult if not impossible to examine a ballot you hold in your hand and proclaim it fraudulent. Much less 81,000 of them.
The other thing is that nobody, but nobody conceived of the idea that fraud would or even could be so widespread and virulent and purposeful. And nobody foresaw the extent to which the establishment would universally explode in vengeful fury at those who questioned the results. I’d have thought the populace/electorate would be keenly interested in signs of fraud on a purely non-partisan or anti-partisan basis.
I don’t have unbridled criticism of Sidney Powell. It seems to me like she caught a medium case of Lin Wood disease, who started out rational and measured and then went completely nuts. Maybe it was he, in fact, who was the first (and only, at the time) to see just how far the establishment would go to defend itself and deliberately went bonzo in order to get himself out of the corner he and the others backed themselves into.