Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fani Willis, Who Indicted Trump for Questioning Election Tweets, Questioned Election in Tweets
Front Page Magazine ^ | August 25, 2023 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 08/26/2023 3:51:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Two sets of laws. Selective prosecution means they get enforced only against political opponents.

And so the nation watched the disgraceful circus unfold in Atlanta with a pro-crime DA indicting her political opponents including former President Trump for, among other things, tweets.

Benny Johnson however documented multiple instances of Fani Willis, the DA, tweeting her skepticism of the election and calling it into question.

Like this one in which she seizes on the water leaks to raise questions about the count as Trump’s associates have been accused of doing.

Questioning elections is obviously illegal when Democrats win but an urgent defense of democracy when Republicans win. Since Fani Willis did not yet know the outcome of the election, it was ‘legal’ to question it at the time because she was worried a Republican might win, but once a Dem had won it, it became retroactively illegal to question it.

(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020election; arrestfanniwillis; election; electioninterference; faniwillis; questionedelection; trump; trumppersecution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2023 3:51:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The defendants should have the right to call her as a witness.


2 posted on 08/26/2023 3:59:58 PM PDT by Pres Raygun (Repent America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“We must strip her of all funding and, if appropriate, impeach Fani Willis,”
Colton Moore, vice chairman of Georgia Freedom Caucus, said in a statement.

“America is under attack,” Moore wrote on X. “I’m not going to sit back
and watch as radical left prosecutors politically TARGET their opponents.”

A probe into Willis’s prosecution of Trump could lead
to her impeachment, Breitbart reported.

Contact Congress
U.S. House of Representatives:
* Telephone: 202-225-3121
* Website: http://www.house.gov/
U.S. Senate:
* Telephone: 202-224-3121
* Website: http://www.senate.gov/

Message: Republicans control the House
<><>you must issue Willis a Subpoena
<><>and have the Capitol Police serve her
<><>bring her in for a House Committee hearing
<><>then just REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY
<><>while searching her entire Background for a Crime
<><>meanwhile moving forward proceedings to impeach her.

Online form to contact Colton Moore.
https://www.contactmypolitician.com/home/contact-us


3 posted on 08/26/2023 4:02:07 PM PDT by Liz (More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones. St Teresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When will big Fani be arrested?


4 posted on 08/26/2023 4:07:20 PM PDT by Brown Deer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pres Raygun

“The defendants should have the right to call her as a witness.”

The prosecutor, hilarious...it’s going to be the best TV ever. Trump does it again.


5 posted on 08/26/2023 4:08:06 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She’s a black Democrat...hypocrisy is thy name.


6 posted on 08/26/2023 4:08:57 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

NEVER!! She’s a BLACK FEMALE DEMOCRAT!


7 posted on 08/26/2023 4:10:16 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

A review of Fani Willis’ indictment against Trump reveals the woman actually reads
at third grade level w/ a zero IQ. Her ludicrous, politically motivated charges include:

<><>criminalizing free speech,
<><>listing numerous mundane “acts” she “says” further a “conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election.
<><>criminalizing text asking for phone nos “to chat with state leaders”
<><>Trump’s conversations on election results as a “furtherance” of alleged crimes.
<><>Trump’s tweets constitute a “furtherance” of alleged crimes
<><>Trump conspiring when he asked voters to watch televised GA Legislature hearings.

Upshot: Willis would give Democrats a monopoly on election results conversations.


Reality Check

In 2017, a woman sued conservative actor, James Woods, for misidentifying her as a Nazi in an allegedly libelous tweet. The tweet included a photo not of her but of a different woman giving a Nazi salute while wearing a Donald Trump t-shirt at a campaign event.

The court ruled in favor of Woods under the “innocent construction rule.”
She appealed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the ruling.

The “innocent construction rule” requires courts to consider a written or oral statement in context, giving the words, and their implications, their natural and obvious meaning.

If a statement may reasonably be interpreted innocently, it cannot be actionable per se. [Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., 381 F.3d 717, 726-727 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004)]


8 posted on 08/26/2023 4:12:28 PM PDT by Liz (More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones. St Teresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Our justice system is corrupt as Hell and this proves it.


9 posted on 08/26/2023 4:20:09 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hypocrisy is a hallmark of the left.

In fact, one of the ones they worship, Alinsky, rules that they should accuse their opposition of what they themselves are doing.


10 posted on 08/26/2023 4:20:26 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“And this fraud is the woman putting people in jail!”


11 posted on 08/26/2023 4:21:04 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s (D)ifferent.


12 posted on 08/26/2023 4:23:41 PM PDT by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats are the party of do what I say not what I do


13 posted on 08/26/2023 4:26:47 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Queen can question the subjects, but the subjects should never question the queen. Same thing in Arizona.


14 posted on 08/26/2023 4:27:37 PM PDT by Sertorius (A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...

p


15 posted on 08/26/2023 4:55:15 PM PDT by Liz (More tears are shed over answered prayers than over unanswered ones. St Teresa of Avila)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
God Almighty I hate that uppity look!


16 posted on 08/26/2023 4:55:37 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Big Fanni Willis is a kingpin of Obozo.


17 posted on 08/26/2023 4:56:23 PM PDT by chopperk ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bkmk


18 posted on 08/26/2023 6:05:55 PM PDT by Its All Over Except ...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Proof that she is selectively prosecuting what is free speech, just to pile on allegations against Trump.

If what Trumps lawyers and advisers said to him led him to say things about the election, and seek actions based on those things, they - Trump et al - were doing no less than exercising what comes from freedom of speech - which includes freedom to reach diffferent conclusions about events.


19 posted on 08/26/2023 6:09:52 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is what lawyers call an “admission by a party opponent,”. Trump’s legal team can admit this statement/tweet into evidence.


20 posted on 08/26/2023 6:23:00 PM PDT by bort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson