Deflection of the argument. Again, you did not read the article. The article told about the the discovery of Ivermection in Japanand derived from a compound discovered in a soil microbe. Ivermectin is a very effective drug to treat parasites in humans and animals. However, cattle treated with ivermectin are not allowed to be slaughtered for food purposes. In the article there are these words:
“Ivermectin has helped treat hundreds of millions of people and billions of pets and farm animals for parasitic diseases. Its discovery even garnered a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015. But now several groups of doctors are encouraging and enabling people to take the drug off-label to treat or prevent COVID—despite a lack of solid evidence that it works against the disease and the fact that high doses can be harmful. In doing so, some experts believe these groups are undermining vaccination efforts.”
In fact, HCQ and Ivermectin were removed from India’s Covid-19 treatment protocol because studies found that these drugs have little to no effect on Covid-related mortality or clinical recovery of the patient.
Why is the standard for Ivermectin which is taken voluntarily by some, so much higher than that of the Covid 'vaccine' which in many locations was forced upon the public in exchange for being able to have a job or meet the requirement for attending school?
There was around 20 years worth of evidence that mRNA 'vaccines' were failures by the time the Plandemic was unrolled- animal test subjects routinely sickened and died over the years of testing and the mRNA platform had never been successfully used to treat illness in a single human patient before - it wasn't safe enough to try on humans given the outcome for the animal test subjects. Yet it was forced on people world-wide for the plandemic.
I've never seen you question or criticize that mRNA decision; you only attack Ivermectin, which has a long history of use in Japan, US, Africa etc. and has a remarkably good safety profile, particularly when compared with mRNA 'vaccines'.
The medical regime doesn't want admit Ivermectin works so it exerts pressure on places like India, pressuring them to deny it works, even though it does and the public knows. So India bowed to pressure to remove Ivermectin & HCQ and now their massive population is robbed of safe and effective treatments for illness. You celebrate this.
People pm FR have told me they took Ivermectin with great success. It has been successfully used by too many world-wide to then go back and say, oh, wait, it really doesn't work at all. Too many people benefitted from it; they now know to distrust the medical regime (and its trolls) when it lies to them about Ivermectin.
The NIH and CDC deny Ivermectin & HCQ are effective but the public has their own first hand knowledge to reference. Who is the public going to believe? The lying treacherous CDC or their own personal experience successfully taking Ivermectin/HCQ at a time when doctors refused to treat sick people?