Well said. Now let us review some history
- Bush 1 - Read My lips No New Taxes - that did not age well
- Bush 2 - no win war in IRAQ, Afghanistan - almost liked war as much as LBJ - just another Texas Dem.
- The most famous Senator from Arizona, he was a great friend of OBAMA - not sure why he even ran as an R. - can you elucidate on this one?
- Romney - between him and the other Mormon, the one from Arizonam you remeber the Dem Speaker of the House, the one before Nanci - why vote for an R?
Possibly you have no issues with the gopE or Dem Uniparty, possibly you know no history and are happy to relive it?
Now go back and look at who each of those candidates ran against. Were they better or worse for the country than their opponent? Do you really think we would have been better off after 9-11 with Gore as president? Or better with Dukakis or Kerry? Do you think McCain or Romney would have done more damage than Obama did?
All of them had flaws, and failed in many ways, but were better choices than the Dems. You fight like hell to get the nominee of your choice, but if you don’t, you vote for the best option left available. You don’t go 3rd party and you don’t take your ball and go home, because that is just giving the country over to the Left without a fight.