Posted on 01/09/2023 8:05:45 AM PST by SoConPubbie
This isn’t Kristi Noem’s first rodeo, and if the powerful Sanford Health has a say, it won’t be her last.
It’s curious that in one of the reddest states in the nation, which boasts both a Republican governor and a whopping 90 percent GOP majority legislature, the child-mutilation business would be allowed not only to exist but to flourish. But thanks to Gov. Kristi Noem’s repeated failures to cut ties with radical gender ideology and its proponents, next week two of South Dakota’s government contractors will host a “Midwest Gender Identity Summit” in the Mount Rushmore State.
The event — hosted by Sanford Health, the Dakotas’ top health care system, and the Transformation Project, a radical transgender ideology activism organization that targets children — is aimed at medical professionals and purportedly seeks to “review the needs of transgender patients in healthcare.”
One of the summit’s co-hosts, the Transformation Project, is responsible for aiding what The Washington Post called an “advocacy campaign that has made cherry-red South Dakota the unlikely epicenter of a transgender uprising on the American Great Plains.”
When reports surfaced that the South Dakota government funneled $136,000 to the Transformation Project via a government contract for a community health worker program, Noem’s office rightly demanded the Department of Health quickly cut ties.
“South Dakota does not support this organization’s efforts, and state government should not be participating in them,” Noem told The Daily Signal. “We should not be dividing our youth with radical ideologies. We should treat every single individual equally as a human being.”
Noem is correct that government, especially when controlled by the GOP, should not enable business that promotes harmful ideologies and the sterilization and disfigurement of children’s bodies.
Yet her government still maintains three $78,000 contracts with Sanford Health, the other co-host of the upcoming transgender summit, for the development of community health worker programs in Clear Lake, Sioux Falls, and Vermillion.
As National Review’s Nate Hochman documented earlier this week, Noem’s office and the state’s Republican legislators regularly engage with and leverage the soft power of Sanford Health.
It’s hardly uncommon for governments to be beholden to certain interests, and South Dakota’s closeness to the “largest rural health system in the United States” is no exception. Sanford is the Dakotas’ biggest employer, so it’s no surprise that plenty of Sanford-employed or -connected South Dakotans have made their way into the state’s government or to Noem’s roundtable.
What is uncommon is that a state that prides itself on being led by Republicans for decades routinely embraces the counsel of an organization that offers mutilative surgeries — such as mastectomies, which are known by the euphemism “top surgery” — to kids. Not only does Sanford profit from maiming minors, but it routinely lobbies against legislation that protects medical professionals’ conscience rights and would ban the mangling and drugging of children in the name of transgenderism.
Despite Sanford’s anti-conservative track record, the company once considered to be the governor’s “top donor” still sits in a position of influence with the governor and her GOP allies.
When asked whether Noem would continue to take donations from Sanford despite their long history of lobbying against the sort of socially conservative policies that South Dakota voters expect their Republican government to embrace, her office did not directly answer the question.
Instead, Noem’s Chief of Communications Ian Fury directed The Federalist to a Twitter thread in which he not only defended Noem’s decision to reject a 2021 bill that would have protected girls’ sports, but also ripped on Hochman for bringing Noem’s ties to Sanford and other problematic lobbyists to light.
“Governor Noem and these groups have been on opposite sides of many issues,” Fury tweeted on Thursday evening, claiming later that Noem is “the most conservative Governor in America.”
Fury admitted that Sanford has a history of opposing pro-life policies and lobbying in favor of health care legislation that did not meet the governor’s standard. Yet he refused to address why the company and its activist allies, the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations and the South Dakota State Medical Association, still have close political and advisory relationships with Noem and other South Dakota Republicans.
Over the last few years, Noem has repeatedly had opportunities to reject the left’s creeping grasp on Midwest institutions, especially when it comes to radical LGBT ideology. When South Dakota State University hosted a so-called “kid-friendly” drag show, Noem didn’t offer to fire any of the school’s governing regents even though she has the power to do it. When South Dakota’s Family Heritage Alliance Action Executive Director Norman Woods wrote Noem a letter expressing disappointment that the governor had failed to protect her constituents, Noem said he was the one who should be fired.
For years now, Noem has prioritized business interests, even when medically coercive, over her conservative voters and values. And instead of reliably standing firm against leftism and defending her constituents, Noem enabled the left’s agenda and then cried “cancel culture” when she was criticized for her cowardice.
It was Noem’s “top advisor,” lawyer and Sanford Health lobbyist Matt McCaulley, who pushed her to walk back her support for the sports bill. Noem reportedly announced her veto the same day McCaulley’s client Sanford Health funneled $40 million to an expansion of its sports complex.
If it weren’t for her initial buckling on the key legislation that would have protected girls’ sports, Noem might still be considered a front-runner for the 2024 presidential ticket. Instead, she has repeatedly sacrificed her voters, her conservative career, and key culture war ground by subjecting herself to the whims of corporate interests.
If Noem wants a chance to be taken seriously as a conservative stakeholder, she can start by wiping out her state’s relationship with Sanford Health and any other facilitators of transgender mutilation.
The support of the trans movement by women in this country just completes our descent into 3rd world status.
If she were the Most Conservative Governor. But she isn’t. Not by a long shot.
And given who that state elects to serve in Congress, I’d say it’s pretty much a mess across the board.
Repeal the 19th Amendment.
[Self-censored]
I am a South Dakota native, lived in the state for decades and was a health care lobbyist to the state Legislature. The arm chair quarterbacks demanding Governor Noem’s ideological purity by cutting all ties to Sanford Health simply do not understand the realities in South Dakota. Sanford for good or bad is the largest provider of health care in the state operating not only many of the state’s hospitals, but a large percent of the states nursing homes and long term care facilities. Sanford is also an integral part of the state’s medical school, nurses training and nurse practitioner programs. Think of it like this….you have a neighbor who is a hard core liberal, but every winter takes his snow blower and cleans your driveway, watches your dog while you are on vacation and fixed your leaking kitchen sink and never asks for any payment. Do you tell him to get lost since you don’t like his politics?
Congrats to the Jackrabbits for winning the FCS. Nice to see the “other” Dakota get the title for a change.
And then you catch him trying to convince your son to become a girl ...
If Sanford’s functioning is dependent on mutilating children, then let them sell their business. I am sure that it would NOT be hard to find someone to run medical facilities in South Dakota minus mutilating boys and girls.
Sounds like a RINO hit piece against Noem, because she’s successfully resisting them.
The other big system in South Dakota is Avera. I don’t know anything about them yet.
How does it feel to have your children indoctrinated and Groomed into LGBTQI worldview by pedophiles? That’s the result of Kristi Noem’s approval of this abomination
She vetoed the women sports bill and caused me to veto ever voting for her.
You know, it seems like almost every post I make I have to call out former politicians that I really liked, for how they’ve started betraying us.
MTG, Dan Crenshaw, Donald Trump, now Noem.
But they HAVE started betraying our TRUST.
WE didn’t change. THEY did.
And once trust is broken, it’s not easily regained. I hope they can regain my trust, but they seem a lot more interested in just daring me to cut my ties, which I am more than ready to do, and call them out endlessly for it. I don’t care how few of us there are, either. 20 just changed the whole government.
She sided with the freaks over humans...
What failures are you referring to? Right now, DeSantis and Gaetz, are by far the 2 best things conservatives have going for them.
Had DeSantis still been in Congress, he would have likely become the new Speaker, or at least been someone willing to challenge the RINO McCarthy for the vote.
I have no idea why you seem to hate him so much, other than he is potentially the main alternative to Trump in '24, should DeSantis eventually chose to run, and by being so consistent and true to conservative issues, DeSantis causes the current Trump to pale in comparison.
“you have a neighbor who is a hard core liberal, but every winter takes his snow blower and cleans your driveway, watches your dog while you are on vacation and fixed your leaking kitchen sink and never asks for any payment. Do you tell him to get lost since you don’t like his politics?”
If he is trying to groom my children to have sex with them, yes, I think I would tell him to get lost.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.