Skip to comments.
Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County Ask Judge for Sanctions Against Kari Lake, Her Lawyers
The Epoch Times ^
| December 26, 2022 Updated: December 26, 2022
| Jack Phillips
Posted on 12/26/2022 7:17:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The Arizona Secretary of State’s office and Maricopa County on Monday petitioned a judge to sanction GOP candidate Kari Lake after her election-related lawsuit was rejected over the weekend.
On Monday, the two parties filed a motion in the Maricopa County Superior Court against Lake and her legal team.
“Courts are established by Arizona’s Constitution and statutes to resolve actual disputes between parties,” Maricopa County Deputy Attorney Thomas P. Liddy wrote Monday in a 15-page memo (pdf), asking Judge Peter Thompson for the sanctions and attorneys fees. “They do not exist so that candidates for political office can attempt to make political statements and fundraise. And they should not be used to harass political opponents and sow completely unfounded doubts about the integrity of elections. All of those things happened in this matter.”
Hobbs’s legal team joined the motion for sanctions, according to court documents.
“Enough really is enough. It is past time to end unfounded attacks on elections and unwarranted accusations against elections officials,” the memo also said. “This matter was brought without any legitimate justification, let alone a substantial one.”
The memo also asserted that Lake “and her counsel doubled down with the present action … this Court should sanction both lawyers and client under [Arizona law] to impart to them the seriousness of their misuse of the courts to seek to undermine Arizona elections and impugn hardworking elections workers and officials for purely political – not legal – purposes.”
The motion asks that Lake pay $25,050 in attorney fees for Hobbs and Maricopa County.
(Excerpt) Read more at 12ft.io ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: attainder; hobbs; lake; maricopatruththread; sidebarabuse; thestoogewall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Democrats should be required to pay when their lawfare loses.
As if.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
These corrupt dirt bags operate in a manner that would make drug cartels envious!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Townhall columnist speculated that that the judge got orders emailed from Marc Elias.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
5
posted on
12/26/2022 7:27:30 PM PST
by
Shady
(The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wonder if Tom Liddy’s daddy, G. Gordon, would approve?
6
posted on
12/26/2022 7:28:53 PM PST
by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't. )
To: patriot torch; Extremely Extreme Extremist; AndyJackson; Shady; T-Bird45
The Democrat Party has The Blue Wall in the states that they own, and in the counties that they own, they have The Stooge Wall.
7
posted on
12/26/2022 7:41:10 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
To: T-Bird45
G. Gordon would have punched him in his Fascist stooge mouth.
8
posted on
12/26/2022 7:41:54 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Vicious communist bastards!
The Communist Purge Continues To Grow Exponentially & Nothing Is Being Done About It!
”In your face” is our communist masters' favorite tool to rattle the chains of tyranny that they have wrapped around our necks...
No Big Deal!
Our communist masters know that the pathetically servile and indolent Aamerican people will just continue to roll over and spread their collective cheeks.
9
posted on
12/26/2022 7:45:01 PM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperatly need him)
To: T-Bird45
The G-Man once worked for the FBI but moved on to do other things like the Watergate Burglary for the Richard Nixon campaign. That guy was tough as nails.
But he was obviously with his FBI and political campaign experiences a man who knew how to do dirty operations.
So if his son decides to defend a dirty operation, should we be surprised or stunned.
The father lived to see the 2020 election and its aftermath dying in March of 2021. I wonder what he thought of Trump who was encouraged to run for POTUS by Richard M. Nixon?
10
posted on
12/26/2022 7:45:24 PM PST
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Offense. Always stay on offense.
To: Nextrush
The American colonials knew how to deal with Establishment stooge “judges”...
12
posted on
12/26/2022 7:54:15 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
To: Nextrush
His other son was busted for child porn.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Haven’t heard squat from the RNC.
Ronna must be too busy spending money that she scammed from her donors.
To: FR_addict
15
posted on
12/26/2022 8:00:17 PM PST
by
Nextrush
(FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
THIS IS BS!
Kari Lake has EVERY RIGHT to contest the election.
Punitive actions against questioning elections just show the totalitarian oppression that is growing in our free country.
SIC SEMPER TYRANUS
16
posted on
12/26/2022 8:02:49 PM PST
by
Skywise
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This corrupt “judge” will probably agree.
17
posted on
12/26/2022 8:05:33 PM PST
by
teletech
(you)
To: Skywise
SIC SEMPER TYRANUS We can hope.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What is being asked here to the judge is to block the act of the right by the Constitution to get relief of justice and to opportunity to freedom of speech in how it is done.
“Courts are established by Arizona’s Constitution and statutes to resolve actual disputes between parties...”
Not when you block the investigative actions and public disclosure of possible unconstitutional and legal rights. You just denied the opportunity to accomplish what you say courts are for.
wt69
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Kari Lake dared to bring a lawsuit against Arizona officials for manipulating the outcome of the 2022 gubernatorial election. Last Saturday, despite affirming the numerous issues in the election, a Maricopa judge ruled Ms. Lake failed to prove malicious intent for the failed electronic voting systems and broken chain of custody issues.
Without an admission of intent, and without evidence to prove to a demonstrable certainty the errors, mistakes and broken election procedures were intended to influence the election outcome, Judge Peter Thompson ruled against the challenge and asked the defense team to provide him with a list of sanctions against the Lake campaign.
Today, the team of Katie Hobbs asked the court for $25,050 in fines against Kari Lake and other penalties and fines the court may deem necessary to punish the plaintiff for challenging a duly certified election result. [Today Court Filing Here]
(Via NBC) – […] Hobbs and the county asked for sanctions against Lake and her legal team after an Arizona judge denied Lake’s bid to reverse the results of the November election in a two-day trial. Lake, a prominent election denier and Trump ally, was allowed to go to trial last week with two of her 10 claims, which alleged misconduct with ballot printers and problems with ballot chain of custody.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson denied Lake’s challenge after the trial in a 10-page ruling Saturday. He said the court did not find clear and convincing evidence of misconduct that would have changed the election results. Thompson also noted that the defendants had stated their intention to seek sanctions against Lake and ordered them to file a motion for sanctions by Monday morning.
Attorneys for Hobbs, who has been Arizona’s secretary of state for four years, joined the county in its filing Monday seeking $25,050 from Lake, which includes attorney fees for Hobbs and the state’s most populous county. The county took aim at Lake’s remarks before the election indicating she would not accept the results unless she won, as well as her “groundless” and “frivolous” lawsuit after the election was certified. (read more)
I’m a little surprised Mrs. Hobbs did not request 1,000 hrs of indentured servitude against Mrs. Lake, whereby the plaintiff would be forced to cook, clean and do other domestic chores for the wounded Mrs. Hobbs. Then again, I probably shouldn’t give them any ideas.
20
posted on
12/26/2022 8:09:26 PM PST
by
Bratch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson