Posted on 12/21/2022 5:48:59 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Wednesday on FNC’s “America Reports,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) argued the United States should be “all in”on Ukraine.
According to the South Carolina Republican lawmaker, failure in Ukraine would set a bad precedent for hostile actors around the globe.
“A lot of news, a lot happening,” host Sandra Smith said. “We’re watching the White House. We will be watching the Capitol later today. To what extent do you believe this country should continue to aid Ukraine in this fight?”
“Completely all in, without equivocation,” he said. “If Putin dismembers Ukraine, he will not stop. China’s more likely to go into Taiwan. The world will unravel. And no domestic problem gets better here at home allowing Putin to destroy Ukraine, quite the opposite.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Lindsey…..what did you do?
That’s what all of this talk sounds like - plus rage at the American public for “Not even caring!”
There was a domino effect after VietNam but that was then and this is now. Different world.
Not everyone you dislike is Hitler.
Yep. Especially once China allies with them.
From Wikileaks files written by Tony Blair
Graham is free to sell all his worldly goods and send the proceeds to Ukraine. He can empty out his retirement, savings, and stock funds, and send that money as well. I’m thinking of emailing or calling him and letting know I have no objection to such an action on his part.
Who the heck are these people who have suddenly decided that the border, Ukraine’s BORDER, is the most important issue for our nation?
I didn’t agree to this.
A pox on them all!
Bingo! I’m beyond draft age myself, but I tell the young men I work with I’ll help them dodge any Xiden/ $oros/ Rino/ Democrat conscription attempts. One laughed and said he’d run off to Mexico rather than let that election stealing piece of $#!+ tell him he’s going into the army!
If Lindsay really wants to be all in, why doesn’t he just cut to the chase and have our forces just eliminate Moscow and St. Petersburg ... or could it be that it is much more profitable for all to have the war grind on and on while money and weapons just disappear in mass quantities?
.
Look at Oliver North’s bank records.
He’s on more payrolls than Chelsea Clinton.
And all he does is call for bombs to be dropped.
.
This simply demonstrates John McCain is still alive and well.
Ronald Reagan would have closed the laundromat.
Eerily similar to German militarists, speaking in the Kaiser’s name, offering Austria-Hungary a “blank check” in “The Guns of August.” Why did McCain want war so much? Did he fancy himself the “Red Horseman of the Apocalypse?” Was he trying to make up for being a “songbird” in the “Hanoi Hilton?” Or did he think he could trick us into thinking he was a “patriot” for being so warlike, even after betraying America repeatedly via his foreign, immigration, and trade policy postures in the Senate?
Amnesty and an 'assault' weapons ban.
We don’t have troops on the ground in Ukraine.
Ukrainian men and women are doing the dirty work for us - of defending the west against the commie soviet forces. The least we can do is to help them out with weapons. We are providing those weapons via the “lend-lease’ program.
Ukraine will be paying back most of the US support. Lots of rebuilding contacts for American business when the war is over.
It’s about time we get a Reagan mindset! Resist communism now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.