Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blitz128

Oh ok gotcha. I thought you were sincere. You’re just an ideological Ukraine advocate. The point is that Russia has had it since 1783, not that there are trying to reclaim an ancient claim. same fleet the whole time. The USSR communists moved it within their system but they never gave up control of it. After the 91 breakup it would have remained that way. But the Uke nazis funded by us took over and the retards in DC fantasized there were going to turn a Russian navy base since 1783 into a US Navy NATO base.
Mix in some ethnic cleaning and the die was cast.

That’s why, but you already knew that didn’t you?


58 posted on 12/20/2022 5:34:40 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Got ya so only the most recent history matters. And Russia was always such a good friend to Ukrainians like starving millions of them, btw that is not ancient history. Even if as you say the nazis took over Ukraine it was still the country of Ukraine.
I believe the acquisition of Alaska falls in your timeline is that in play?
Strategically controlling Alaska would be a bigger deal than Ukraine.
Much if not most of the current borders of US fall within your timeline are in play
Can England, Spain and France and the ottoman’s reclaim their empires as they also fall within and even before in many cases your timeline

At what point is something set in stone? 1991, 1954, …..


59 posted on 12/20/2022 5:59:36 AM PST by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson