Wait!....did I miss something? When did we start honoring the Constitution again?
In essence, what Trump is saying is - if there is no way to revise or change the rules and regulations in order toreverse the effect of widespread fraud and deception, then the country is lost. It’s like being on a sinking ship and being told that nothing can be done about it.
It stopped a long time ago, when the United States Supreme Court raised a figurative water-tight "wall" to separate promotion of church functionality from that of supposedly "neutral" (but then really agnosticalyy unchristian) governmental operations, by a narrow--not overwhelming--margin in the Everson vs Board of Education (1947) decision.
A basis for that cancerous political disease did not exist in any previous history of the Court's operations, despite Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr's ruling that from his time henceforth the Court's decisions would be based on "case law" (precedence) rather than "natural (Bible-morality) law" (that starts from first principles and develops from there).
Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution have never recovered from the lethal wounds and accompanying spiritual cancer that the wholly unwarranted comprehensive USSC "separation" decision delivered to these documents, and freed atheistic perpetrators to take down a God-fearing Republic.
Everson v. Board of Education (click here)
Establishment ClauseNow, remember that every Justice on the Everson Court was appointed by a Progressive-minded President, and determinedly so by a President that wanted to pack the Court with men who would sustain his socialist programs.
(excerpt)
In Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), the Supreme Court ruled as constitutional a New Jersey statute allocating taxpayer funds to bus children to religious schools — because it did not breach the “wall of separation” between church and state — and held that the establishment clause of the First Amendment applied to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.
Despite the Court’s narrow 5-4 decision, the mix of separationist reasoning and accommodationist outcome has made the case a popular precedent for liberals as well as conservatives. The commonly used phrase “separation of church and state” is derived from the “wall” metaphor in this case; the Court in turn borrowed it from Roger Williams and Thomas Jefferson.
=======
(Click on the link above to read more of this.)
The result of having such kind of Justices enthroned throughout this branch of government is that we have elected people to office in the other two branches whose personal preferences has been pushing the concepts of a Biblical God, His Son the King of all creation, and His motivating Spirit far enough away from the operation of the various governments that they can satisfy their own selfish motives, by pandering to the depraved instincts of the godless elements of the population, thus yielding its control to the god of this world and his human lust- and drug-ridden slaves.
And now, the curtain on this trend has been drawn back. To even the most insensitive human, the effects are now not merely visible, but also quite tangibly impacting the now-powerless citizen's freedoms without judicial, legislative, or executive relief.
The selection system is broken, and apparently cannot be fixed that it be restored to its use as originally intended.