Of course, polls could have been wrong all along. However, that seems unlikely, given the consistency of the results in a number of polls, administered by many different polling organizations. For the Lake-Hobbs contest, the results displayed by FiveThirtyEight came from 13 different polling organizations, as shown in Figure 2. Only one (Marist) had Hobbs winning:
Figure 2: Lake-Hobbs polling organizations and results
Did 12 out of 13 companies make the same error, and in the same direction?
We see the same pattern with the senatorial contests. Figure 3 displays the final polling averages, as produced by RealClearPolitics, for seven key races. In each case the GOP candidate was leading just before the election, even though these races were in different states and conducted by different pollsters, and for different candidates. This pattern does not suggest polling error. The actual election results (courtesy of Reuters) are also shown.
Three of the seven contests were won by Republicans, but look deeper. In every case, the Democrat candidate’s election results were sharply higher than the final polling percentage. For the most part, that was not the case for Republicans, as we can see in the right-side columns in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Senatorial polling versus results
Figure 4, below, presents the same information in graphic form. Keep your eye on the “zero” line. It shows the expected results for both Democrats and Republicans. Democrats are entirely above the “expected” line, signifying that they beat the predictions in every case. On the other hand, Republicans are much lower, and mostly below the expected line.
Figure 4: Senatorial polling results, shown graphically
Before we address ballot-harvesting, let’s summarize: Perhaps I missed it, but it seems there was no last minute erosion of support for GOP candidates. And polling error is unlikely, given that the GOP lead was shown by many different pollsters, in different states, and for different candidates. Yet, the Democrat candidates consistently beat expectations by quite a lot. Why was that?
Ballot-harvesting
It is just a theory, but I believe that aggressive ballot-harvesting is the most likely explanation for the disparity between pollster predictions and actual results in the 2022 midterm elections. In the movie, 2,000 Mules, True the Vote (TTV), the organization run by Catharine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, described the prevalence of ballot-harvesting in the 2020 election. Although its estimates are only rough approximations (based on cell phone analysis), TTV believes there were up to 200,000 and 275,000 harvested ballots in Arizona and Pennsylvania, respectively. Nevada was not included in the TTV analysis, but since the end of 2020, Nevada has taken all restrictions off of harvesting. It is now legal to harvest ballots in Nevada, and it can be done anonymously in any quantity with ballots from unregistered homeless people, drug addicts— anyone. [Editor's note: See also phantom voting, previously published at American Thinker by contributor Jay Valentine, here and here.]
When it comes to the legality of ballot-harvesting, there is confusion. As noted, it is now completely legal in the state of Nevada. In most other swing states, including Pennsylvania and Arizona, it is (technically) allowed only within tight limitations (e.g., for family members). That said, large-scale harvesting operations have been performed in many states, and I believe they often lead to serious election law violations. There are three reasons for this:
Bkmk
.
The Elections have a similar look.
Count every vote until the Democrat is ahead.
And the Networks (including FOX) locked hands to say what’s really important this time - is for no one to question any Election.
It’s not the Robbery, what’s important is that the store owners don’t report the Robbery.
Sick stuff
.
Compare Obama's record 2008 turnout by county to the JoeTatoe's 2020 "turnout" by county in each state.
This will show you where they rigged the votes.
A secondary piece of the tool:
Once you have the 2008 to 2020 comparison, THEN you back-compare to Hillary 2016 by county.
You'll see where they failed in 2016, and exactly how they decided to "fortify" Basement Joek's "election".
They used a brute-force IT method - take the top population counties in each state, and rig them in favor of the JoeTatoe.
It wasn't necessary to actually WIN the counties - just inflate the Tatoe totals well over Obama's 2008 totals, and they were good to go.
Once you get down to the lower population counties, the JoeTatoe stops beating Obama's record 2008 turnout.
TOTALLY by coincidence, of course.
IMO, voting should be on one day, in person with a photo ID, on paper ballots, and a finger dipped in an indelible purple ink (that wears off in a week) to show you voted.
No same day registration. No early voting. No drop boxes. No electronic machines with no paper trail. No voting on college campuses.
There should be an annual purge of all voter rolls. Convicted of a felony? You get purged. You die? You get purged. You permanently move out of state? You get purged. Any state that fails to comply should get an automatic 50% reduction in all federal funds.
Florida, Utah & Oregon saw Significant Red-Shifts
Utah & Oregon have Solid integrity in their mail-in elections because they were in place by 2016 & not rushed in w/ flaws in 2020.
Call it what you will. Ballot harvesting is nothing but old fashioned stuffing the ballot box.
find or steal
Or make as many as possible.
It takes a well oiled machine to keep the total # of votes from exceeding the # of voters. I would think it includes deleting some votes.
Whatever it is, it has to stop.