Posted on 11/15/2022 6:52:28 AM PST by bitt
p
One way to fight it is to refuse any laws passed by an unlawful regime.
Donofrio was so successful with the Obama citizenship stuff.
Ping
LOL!
That's good stuff.
Yeah, sounds like a scheme for a bunch of lawyers to make a lot of money without accomplishing anything.
but
I would suspect that any suit by any individual would have to be filed in the offending counties by an individual from that county. If so, that/those individual are toast. They’ll kill them, and I am not kidding either.
I heard this morning, that somebody is considering filing suit from my county against the offending counties.
The problem I have is that...the AZ supreme court will not have anything to do with it.
JUST LIKE THE COURTS IN THE 2020 ELECTION.
People have to understand. They have corrupted EVEN THE COURTS.
Arizona election officials are not the main problem, the Leftist controlled federal government is the mother ship.
No Standing...
.
Pathetically disgusted.
“Yeah, sounds like a scheme for a bunch of lawyers to make a lot of money without accomplishing anything.”
Sure, the GOP pays the lawyers to fight the cheating elections and the democrats pay them not to find anything... Lawyer get paid to and not to and nothing happens except lawyers get more money. DO YOU REALLY TRUST LAWYERS? They are less trusted than used car salesmen.
“Yeah, sounds like a scheme for a bunch of lawyers to make a lot of money without accomplishing anything.”
Sure, the GOP pays the lawyers to fight the cheating elections and the democrats pay them not to find anything... Lawyer get paid to and not to and nothing happens except lawyers get more money. DO YOU REALLY TRUST LAWYERS? They are less trusted than used car salesmen.
Oh yeah. Get Kraken on that.
The plan is that
<><>Maricopa attorney admitted there’s the potential for voter fraud with broken machines
<><>plus voter sentiment leans toward lacking trust in results,
<><>Arizona’s method empowers a single voter ( preferably more) to challenge the results
<><>voter action can get the election annulled.
<><>does not require proving voter fraud nor does it require proving intent.
<><>only need to demonstrate enough voters do not trust the results for good reasons,
Considering the election day debacle in Maricopa County, they should have ample reasons to be disenfranchised.
The problem is finding an honest judge to apply the law, and then have it hold up on appeal. I think they have better chances in federal court, but whoever wants to pay to bring a challenge in state court in AZ can have at it. AZ patriots still need to have a backup plan.
For this to be possible, they would have to find an honest judge, which are few and far between today. More than likely they would get a judge like the one that refused to extend voting hours in Maricopa county after all the problems there.
It's over. There is no hope or remedy in the political system for it to be fixed. There is no hope or remedy in the judicial system for it to be fixed.
Oh. And don't hope and pray that the solution is going to be like DeSantis...become a governor and make elections free and fair at a state level. They will not allow another DeSantis either. We've seen that this election.
Get used to it. It's over. It's going to end up like every other banana Republican. Civil war, economic calamity and eventually enslavement.
Get right with God. Don't waste time on the system anymore. Look forward to the second coming of Christ. He will set up a system and establish a government that will never be corrupted.
Can’t we just let “the Kraken” out again? LOL.
It would make absolutely no sense to have an election standard like that. Elections cost a great deal to administer. Assuring accurate results is one objective, probably the primary objective, but somewhere down the list is a goal of administering a proper election at close to minimal reasonable expense to the taxpayers. If you had a standard like that - you would have endless objections leading to invalidation of elections, and requiring endless re-runs.
A lot of discussion has to do with the ballots that were printed with settings that resulted in not enough toner being used in the printing process, which meant that they were rejected by the scanners. The information so far suggests they were sequestered and tabulated later with scanners adjusted for the lower contrast. The details of that are important, and need to be substantiated, but if that was what happened, it's no reason to invalidate the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.