Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Europe’s descent into deindustrialisation
The Spectator (UK) ^ | 29 September 2022 | Philip Pilkington

Posted on 09/30/2022 5:53:47 PM PDT by Mount Athos

The rapid economic collapse that Britain is facing is simply an accelerated version of what the whole of Europe is about to go through; unsustainable borrowing to fund the gap between high energy prices and what households can actually afford. With the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline, there is now no feasible way back. Europe can no longer physically import Russian gas – prices will remain high until Europe builds more energy capacity, which could take years.

What is likely to come of this? High energy prices will render European manufacturing uncompetitive. European manufacturers will be forced to pass through the higher energy costs in the form of higher prices and consumers will find it cheaper to buy products from countries with normal energy prices. The only logical European response to the threat of widespread deindustrialisation is to raise tariffs. This is the only way to equalise prices between more expensive European goods and cheaper foreign goods, therefore artificially supporting European manufacturing. This strategy will lower living standards, depriving Europeans of cheaper goods, but it will at least preserve some manufacturing jobs.

This process looks remarkably like the start of the Great Depression. In the 1920s, due to lopsided financial arrangements initiated in the Treaty of Versailles, western economies accumulated enormous amounts of debt. In 1929, the collapse of the American stock market removed one of the key remaining props and the western economies collapsed. Europe went first and, as trade dried up, America followed it down the hole.

Modern western economies have been accumulating debt for decades. But since the lockdowns in early 2020, this debt accumulation has gone into overdrive. In 2019, Eurozone government debt-to-GDP was 83.8 per cent. In 2020, after the lockdown bailouts were unveiled it shot up to 97.2 per cent. In the same period, Britain’s debt-to-GDP ratio went from 83.8 per cent to 93.9 per cent. These are the largest single increases in history. The run-up in debt during the lockdown was probably unavoidable. But it certainly triggered the beginning of the inflationary pressures we now see everywhere, especially because the lockdowns themselves completely demolished supply chains. So, more money chasing fewer goods. But what has happened since the start of this year is something else entirely.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has triggered an energy price war in Europe that is forcing even higher levels of government borrowing to cover energy costs. Unlike the lockdowns, these energy price increases are putting direct pressure on both prices and the trade balance between countries. Higher energy prices mean that Europe must send more euros and pounds abroad to get energy and so the value of imports rises and these higher import costs are fed through to consumers as businesses try to offset rising energy costs by raising prices. The situation is no longer remotely sustainable. This is almost certainly our 1929 moment.

In the 1930s, Europe fell into an economic black hole. Its economy collapsed and so all the trade that it did with the rest of the world was sucked down the hole with it. Europe then turned in on itself and started raising trade barriers to eke out some semblance of economic normality. This was a classic case of what economists called the ‘fallacy of composition’: what was good for Europe in particular, was bad for the world economy and since Europe was part of the world economy, it turned out to be bad for Europe too. The world slipped into depression.

Could the same thing happen today? The Office of the United States Trade Representative estimates that the United States engaged in over $5.6 trillion of trade – roughly 26 per cent of GDP – in 2019. In the same year, trade with the European Union was estimated at $1.1 trillion – that is approximately 20 per cent of total trade. As European falls into the hole, this trade will fall with it. The American economy, already frail, will likely fall too.

One key difference this time around is that there is a rival economic bloc that could be insulated from these dynamics, the emerging Brics+: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Argentina – with Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia also joining the queue. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, the Brics countries have been solidifying trade and financial ties and adding new members. It appears that the goal is for these economies to decouple as much as possible from the West. If they are successful in doing that – and it looks like they may be – they may avoid the depression. The Nord Stream sabotage could be the point at which future historians mark the end of western dominance.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: energyschadenfreude; haha; itistolaugh; nyuknyuknyuk; philippilkington; thatsashame; thatsashamwow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: jimwatx

“Contributed to”??? Their Gaia worship CREATED this vulnerability. It would never exist but for the idiotic Gaia Worship that left them with no viable alternative. Of course, they could fix this problem in the long term anytime they wanted to. They just need to get serious and do the things they know from past experience actually work.

Besides....wasn’t the pipeline not pumping any gas anymore anyway?

You want to talk about “friendly” nations? How “friendly” is it to freeload off of another country for generations to provide for your defense even though you’ve long since had the money to provide for your own defense?

How “friendly” is it to buy energy from the very country you say you need to be protected from militarily - rather than buying your energy from allies?

How “friendly” is it to go around the world seeking to undermine the foreign policy of an ally for your own financial benefit (Iran, Saddam, Cuba, etc etc)?

How “friendly” is it to seek to unite Europe under your own hegemony by means of demonizing another country that is supposedly your ally and which has been providing for your defense for generations - not to mention a country which allowed grossly unequal trade terms to help you rebuild your economy after a world war you started and lost?

By the way, European countries don’t “have to” become dependent on US LNG. They can frack and drill their own oil and gas. They can mine their own coal. They can build nuclear power plants. They just have to stop destroying their economies and their security and their people’s standard of living in order to worship Gaia.


21 posted on 10/01/2022 7:00:56 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Yes Europe can and should take care of their own energy security, but the US blowing out those gas pipelines was a leap beyond anything a presumed ally would do. It’s basically the US telling Europe, well we warned you about becoming dependent on Russian energy, but since you didn’t listen we’ve decided to take out those pipelines ourselves to prevent you from even thinking about backsliding on those Russian sanctions. It was a giant f*ck you to Europe and just reiterates the attitude Victoria Nuland expressed towards Europe back in 2014.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video
You can only sh!t on an ally so many times before that ally begins to reexamine the relationship.


22 posted on 10/01/2022 8:11:31 AM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
Thank you for showing some common sense with regard to people's fears that BRICS will make the United States irrelevant.

Fact is, most citizens of those countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) would happily emigrate to the USA.

I don't see anybody here packing their bags and looking to move to any of those aforementioned countries. Not even, sadly, anybody from the Left.

23 posted on 10/01/2022 8:24:21 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (4,124,662 active users on Truth Social)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx
Yes that is all true. Especially your last line. You can only sh!t on an ally so many times before that ally begins to reexamine the relationship. Only I would submit it was Germany taking America's generosity for granted while acting in an often petulant self serving fashion which cased many in America to reexamine the relationship. Was it playing hardball and/or dirty to blow up those pipelines? Yes it was. Did the Americans have good reason to suspect the Germans would cave in, roll over, and seek to undermine America yet again to line their own pockets? I'm sure they did suspect this....and the Germans' behavior starting with Willy Brandt gave them good reason to suspect something like this was coming. The Germans exhibited bad faith as an ally for quite a long time.
24 posted on 10/01/2022 8:55:25 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I don’t know who sabotaged the Nord Stream pipeline, but overall the Europeans have put themselves in this predicament. It’s going to be a rough winter.


25 posted on 10/02/2022 10:00:48 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson