Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marcusmaximus

If you suicidal psychopathic hypocrites can’t handle the sh*t coming back in your face, don’t dish it out!

“It was back in February that the West began to threaten Russia with nuclear war in response to a statement given by President Vladimir Putin.”

‘Russia-Ukraine war: The western threat of nuclear annihilation’
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/russia-ukraine-war-western-threat-nuclear-annihilation


7 posted on 09/21/2022 5:09:37 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cranked

20 posted on 09/21/2022 5:15:54 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cranked

Jesus wept, how disingenuous if not full retarded that article is.

Every would-be prime minister of the UK in my lifetime has been asked a question to the effect of, “Hypothetically speaking, if you were prime minister and circumstances arose where a nuclear strike were called for, would you push the button?”

Most answers are a qualified “yes” but only in the most extreme of generic hypothetical scenarios that don’t mention who they’d attack or when. Some are “yes” only if world war 3 was already underway and we’d already been hit by a first strike.

Our resident loonie left tankie ex-leader of the opposition, Jeremy Corbyn, is the only one I can remember who has said that there are no circumstances EVER where he’d press the button. But he’s a CND fanatic; he wanted us to completely get rid of Trident AND conventional armed forces.

Practically everyone who agreed with him is pro Russia. Practically every pro American, pro European or pro NATO politician thought he was a nut.

Only Russia could take Truss’s statement as a direct threat to nuke Russia.

They’re the psychopathic hypocrites. Barely a day’s gone by during this SMO that some space cadet in the Duma hasn’t been on Russian television urging Mr Putin to drop a nuke on someone. Anyone.

They’ve explicitly suggested nuking London, Paris, the Baltics, cities in Ukraine, four named cities in the USA, Sweden and Finland.

Putin didn’t mind when Trump said there are circumstances where he might use nuclear weapons. It REALLY is no different to that. Actually, Liz wasn’t even that explicit.

Most Brits think Putin and co, and their Islamist chums, are just pissed off that a woman who ought to be in the kitchen, had the nerve to talk out of turn.

There’s only one response to the butt-hurt paranoia over what Liz said... “Grow up, you sexist manchild.”


32 posted on 09/21/2022 5:31:51 AM PDT by MalPearce ("You see, but you do not observe". https://www.thefabulous.co/s/2uHEJdj)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cranked
You are delusional. Your argument, and the source you provide to back it up are absolutely ridiculous propaganda and twisting of reality. After Russia and Putin's repeated threats to use nuclear weapons in a first strike, a mere statement of "We have nuclear weapons too" is not a threat.

Trump, both before and after his Presidency, made much more direct and provocative statements about using nuclear weapons against Russia (and North Korea). But he was just being tough, and not a single person here accused him of being a neocon or a psychopath.

130 posted on 09/21/2022 9:48:03 AM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cranked

I recall. How will history books get it right if we can’t even agree with what took place less than a year ago.


144 posted on 09/21/2022 1:42:45 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson