[RummyChick]

They had a warrant. They refused to let the lawyer see it. Only let her see it from 10 feet away where you cant really read it

[es345st]

asked staff to turn security cameras off – but they refused.”

The Mail is being purposely misleading here. The implication is the cameras were left on because staff refused to turn them off. The cameras were shut off but not by staff.

[RedMonqey]

Heard it was a “sealed warrant” so Trump or his lawyer couldn’t read what they were searching for.

Sounds blatantly unlawful to me.

[Dr. Franklin]

They had a warrant. They refused to let the lawyer see it. Only let her see it from 10 feet away where you cant really read it

Hey, that's how close election observers get to seeing things, so why should little things like warrants now be different?