They have ties to Victoria Nuland who has a beef with Russia that goes back generations and is one of the reasons she aided the color revolution that put Zelenskyy in power.
Which sources in Ukraine are you referring to?
Guess who the director of the IFTSOW is. william ‘never met a war he didn’t like’Kristol. About as credible as toilet paper as far as what Russia is up to
Sources in Ukraine believe that the Institute for the Study of War is the least reliable source for information on the war
With General Jack Keane, Bill Kristol, Joe Lieberman, and General Petraeus on the Board of Directors, the Institute for the Study of War is infallible. The should really add the Vindman brothers.
Institute for the Study of War, Board of Directors
General Jack Keane
William Kristol
Joseph I. Lieberman, former US Senator
General David Petraeus
Kimberly Kagan
Kelly Craft, former US Ambassador to the UN
Kevin Mandia
Jack D. McCarthy, Jr.
Bruce Mosler
Warren Phillips
William Roberti
That said, just who in Ukraine is saying their reporting is unreliable, and how?
“Sources in Ukraine believe that the Institute for the Study of War is the least reliable source for information on the war.
They have ties to Victoria Nuland who has a beef with Russia that goes back generations and is one of the reasons she aided the color revolution that put Zelenskyy in power.”
They obviously lack the understanding of the idea of “fixing operation”. It is fun to see that every “battle” Ukraine “won” is after the Russian forces are orderly leaving some location for another objective.
"Sources in Ukraine believe that the Institute for the Study of War is the least
reliable source for information on the war."
How about these guys?
Ukraine says Russian forces withdrawing from Kharkiv — live updates
;0)
They were right when they called the Russian attack on Kyiv stalled with large casualties. So far their maps of areas controlled by both sides are accurate.