2,000 MULES: What must be said about media blackout

mikehuckabee.com ^ | May 13, 2022 | Mike Huckabee

[Heartlander]

2,000 MULES: What must be said about media blackout

On May 5, when Catherine Engelbrecht of True the Vote went on Tucker Carlson’s FOX News show to discuss election fraud, she very strangely did not mention the name of the movie, 2,000 MULES, she had produced with Dinesh D’Souza. The movie she thought she was there to promote, the one premiering that week.

Apparently, she’d been instructed not to.

The resulting conversation was bizarre. According to D’Souza, just before the interview, Tucker and producer Justin Wells quickly got with Engelbrecht and, incredibly, told her she couldn’t say the name of her film on the air. And she was forbidden to say the election was stolen. So if her speech during this interview seemed a little halting and unsure, it’s likely because she was self-editing on the fly.

The caption appearing onscreen was just “A Look Into What Happened in the 2020 Election.”

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1522410956395098114?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed

D’Souza himself has a similar story: he’d been booked on Grant Stinchfield’s Newsmax show but was abruptly canceled. “...why isn’t this a legitimate news story?” he tweeted. “How can so-called news networks pretend it doesn’t exist?”

Unlike FOX News, Newsmax did respond, with this statement:

“Newsmax has covered ‘2000 Mules,’ including airing its trailer dozens of times, airing President Trump’s comments on it, and featuring ‘2000 Mules’ in our daily podcast. Also covered it on Newsmax.com.

We’ve allowed the for-profit ‘2000 Mules’ to run their ads on @Newsmax. We’ve extensively covered the 2020 election, its results, and President Trump’s challenges to the race. Voter integrity issues are of national importance.”

Why, yes, they are. Still, it would’ve been nice for them to explain the cancelation.

https://waynedupree.com/2022/05/znewsmax-2000-mules-dinesh/?yptr=yahoo

Needless to say, the left is loving this. I’ll spare you links to stories from Newsweek, The Daily Beast and other leftist outlets that call D’Souza a “far-right conspiracy theorist” (and worse) and his movie a “bizarre flick that baselessly claims the 2020 election was stolen,” and a “propaganda film peddling a wholly flawed and faulty premise about ballot fraud in the 2020 election.”

Really? We’ve read the so-called “fact”-checks and found them to be amusingly insufficient. Word to the not-wise: SAYING a claim is “debunked” is not the same as actually debunking. Some left-leaning news outlets are linking to the “debunk” from PolitiFact as if it were definitive. Their “fact”-check is laughable.

Yes, there are questions we’d ask about the claims in the film. We’d like to get experts on to go on record about how closely the geospatial cellphone tracking corresponds to a person’s movements. We’d also like to know if the filmmakers ever got security video of the same person at multiple drop boxes and if not, what the explanation for that would be. Of course, the same story is told when one cellphone ID shows up at different locations, but think how effective it would’ve been to see one person show up repeatedly!

If there weren’t such a media blackout on the movie, all this could be discussed in the light of day, on, say, FOX News. (Full disclosure: I’m a FOX News contributor.) That’s what the producers of this movie wanted. But as David Burge (Iowahawk) famously tweeted, “Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.”

My understanding is that most –- perhaps all? –- states require security cameras at drop boxes, but that many states ignore that requirement. Some states that do have cameras are withholding their video. And Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests are being ignored, as is typical.

But in other states, such as Arizona, there’s action. The sheriff of Yuma County, who was in the film, says his office is teaming with the county recorder to investigate 2020 election fraud. They announced Wednesday that as of March, they had 16 open voter fraud cases. Not only are they looking at 2020, but they’ve seen evidence of a “pattern” of fraudulent voter registration forms ahead of the 2022 primary election. Engelbrecht at True the Vote is encouraged.

“What has been happening in Yuma County is happening across the country,” she said. “The targeting of vulnerable communities and vote abuse must be stopped.”

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich has already indicted half a dozen people for illegal ballot harvesting. And D’Souza told investigative reporter John Solomon that the alleged Yuma County “mule” interviewed in the movie is cooperating with authorities. “It seems to be a direct response to the work of both True the Vote and the movie,” D’Souza said.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/2000-mules-exposes-ballot-harvesting-yuma-county-sheriff-announces-voter

Solomon goes on to report that despite the lack of media and being relegated to alternative platforms such as Locals and Rumble, 2,000 MULES has made over $10 million. D’Souza told him that in just five days, a million people have seen it, “which, for a political documentary, is like downright insane.”

Finally, for weekend reading, David Horowitz and John Perazzo have a must-read article about Mark Zuckerberg’s funding of that tax-exempt foundation, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), largely to pay for drop boxes. For Biden to win, by the teensiest margin in history, all they needed to do was spend his strategic influx of cash on “harvesting” ballots and getting them dropped into artfully-placed boxes. $350 million went to their “Safe Elections” Project --- as in, safe for the Democrat candidate? --- and another $69.5 million went to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), whose founder had been a director of People For The American Way. The money to both these foundations was funneled through yet another one, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which supports get-out-the-vote campaigns for the Democrat Party.

The article goes into much more detail about how they use these funds. They claim to be nonpartisan, but, clearly, that is a joke. In 2020, it was easy to use COVID as an excuse to do elections the “safe” way, which coincidentally made cheating safe, too, as easy as pie.

Read the whole thing and be shocked. The list of grants goes on and on, obviously targeted to help Democrats. As The Federalist has noted, “The practical effect of these massive, privately manipulated election-office funding disparities was to create a ‘shadow’ election system with a built-in structural bias that systematically favored Democratic voters over Republican voters.” It “essentially created a high-powered, concierge-like get-out-the-vote effort for Biden...”

And as the Internal Revenue Code unambiguously states, partisan political activity by non-profits is illegal.

This is the sort of conversation a movie like 2,000 MULES should be sparking in TV newsrooms. That would be real reporting, the lack of which is shameful. The political hacks at CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS won’t permit it, and now we see they’re not the only ones who won’t. If this is some sort of “collusion” or “conspiracy” or “joint venture” among the powers that be, to maintain the illusion of an honest election process when we have something very different, then a REAL newsroom would distinguish itself by refusing to be a part of that.

[rlmorel]

Sometime in the last few years, I heard someone say this, and I realized it boiled things down to me in a Manichean fashion, to a yes or no:

There are two sacred covenants between the governed and the governing powers in a constitutional republic such as ours, and for us as the governed to consent to being governed, both of these MUST be inviolably observed to preserve the union of the governed and the governors:

1. Elections to choose who governs us must be free and fair.
   
   
2. Those who govern us must abide by the same laws that we agree to be governed by.

If either of these are abrogated, then we can no longer have a constitutional republic. Both of these have been violated on a regular basis. If we do not remedy this, our country will be no more.

Our survival as a nation is at stake. We may not survive for a number of other reasons, but if we cannot select who leads us and expect they will live under the same laws as we do and and be punished if they don't, then we will not survive no matter what.

[rlmorel]

That was one of the things I found to be quite powerful about it. It may well be censored and ignored in a variety of spaces, but I would like to see how someone thinks they can debunk it.

They are trying to debunk both the geotracking and the algorithms, but the geotracking they use now is endorsed in its effectiveness by the US Military, Law Enforcement, and even the Supreme Court. Pretty hard to debunk that. They can't attack the source of the data. True The Election will shrug their shoulders, hand them the contact information for the data warehouse THEY got their info from and say "Here. You can call them and buy the exact same data we got and used. Have at it."

And they can attack the algorithm, but...any normal person...anyone who has ever been a parent with kids up to no good...any LEO personnel who know the seamy underbelly of society better than most anyone, and...anyone with common sense will see this graphic generated showing the path of a typical ballot "mule" visiting ballot dropboxes at 2 AM, and realize it isn't some guy going out to a convenience store at 2 AM to buy a pack of cigarettes for himself or pickles for his pregnant wife, and it isn't some person driving too or from work.

And lastly, they can't attack the dropbox surveillance video synched to the geotracking. Any normal person...anyone who has ever been a parent with kids up to no good...any LEO personnel who know the seamy underbelly of society better than most anyone, and...anyone with common sense will look at these people getting out of their cars in little dead end alleys, looking all around them to see if anyone is watching, and surreptitiously stuffing a number of ballots into the box before scurrying away, looking around them guiltily...anyone who sees that behavior knows precisely that those people are up to no good.

And that isn't even mentioning the brazen people who walked up in full daylight with people all around and began stuffing ballots into a box. Even a box outside a voting precinct, with people watching them do it openly in stunned amazement. One has to wonder what is going through their minds. What kinds of chumps must they be stand patiently in line to cast their careful vote while someone drives up in a car and neutralizes 10 or 20 of their own votes right in front of their eyes.

Dalberg-Acton, you are so spot on. They can and may well succeed in censoring, muzzling, or ignoring this movie, but...anyone who cares for this country, ANYONE except for Leftists who sees it cannot fail to be moved by it and see they are being fed a pack of lies. And that can be terribly disillusioning for people.

But you are right. Their only defense is to not let people see it, not let people hear about it, and not let people talk about it. And I don't underestimate their power anymore.

[rlmorel]

Good luck. Well worth the effort.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Great post. Thank you!

[Vaduz]

Media only uses one word deny deny deny......................

[hecticskeptic]

I watched it last night and found the geotracking component of this to be very compelling evidence. The folks at True the Vote and D’Souza all need to be congratulated and supported.

I do have one comment on a change/addition that I wish they would have made which I think would have made this more powerful.... As I understand the methodology they used, they used specific criteria to hone in on the Mules; I don’t remember it exactly but to meet the criteria, the targets related to a) mules visiting multiple drop points, b) mules making multiple trips to the drop points and c) multiple visits to the centers where ballots were picked up..... and the bar of ‘multiple’ could be set anywhere but the idea of why it would be necessary for anyone to visit a drop point more than once should raise eyebrows immediately.

What always makes something more powerful is when there is a head to head comparison to something else... or for this case, other locations. During the documentary, cities like Milwaukee and Atlanta were focused on....There is always going to be leftists who come up with some stupid reason why the criteria for the Mules could be met in some ‘innocent way’. What I think would have made the documentary more powerful is if it had of shown how it would have looked if an identical criteria had of been applied to some city that was in a deep red area.... or perhaps even a ‘blue city’ that is in a ‘red state’. Take for example, cities in Texas like Dallas, Houston, Austin and San Antonio.... all which show up as ‘blue cities’ on the 2020 election map ( https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/upshot/2020-election-map.html ) If that same criteria of Mules had of been applied for those cities, would any have been identified?

[rlmorel]

There is a point of difference...I heard another poster say that someone had to pass five non-profits and visit at least ten ballot drop boxes, and I assumed I had heard it incorrectly.

When I watched it again...I thought I heard the one of the two people who were involved with True The Vote say that the criteria was "visited at least one non-profit" which makes more sense to me.

I will try to verify that.

That said, I fail to find any rational explanation for the path followed by a mule in the animated GIF I posted at #62 other than...the person was visiting every dropbox in the region.

Because that is what their path shows.

At 2:30 AM.

And coupled with the video they were able to glean out of that 4 million minutes that was time synchronized with the path driven...well. It does, as Sebastian Gorka said indignantly, beggar belief.

Let's say there were robberies of five houses in a neighborhood. Think of a a parent whose known problematic son was accused of such a thing, were they presented by the authorities with this cell phone tracking path, showing the track, and it showed their son taking a circuitous route that took him out of the way but passed all five burglarized houses in the time frame the robberies took place.

Then they played footage from a security camera on a house that showed their son's car stop nearby and their mask-wearing son wearing rubber gloves comes into view and disappears, then reappears some minutes later.

At that point, a well meaning uncle who happened to be visiting says "There is probably an innocent explanation for this..."

At that point, the mother, father, and detective all pause to look at the uncle in disbelief and irritation.

(LOL, in telling this, it is not YOU who are the uncle, hecticskeptic, it is the Leftists who offer that explanation who should be met with stares of irritated disbelief!)

Just t be clear-they were only focused on the battleground states that Biden won in the wee hours of the morning. They had two million dollars to spend from a grant, and could only afford to buy the "geofenced" tracking data in those states, so they were working within the confines of that, not to mention the "Citizen's Requests" (Like the FOIA requests for federal data but at the state level) they had to put I and hammer through.

Using that data, they WERE able to see that pattern shown in the animated GIF at post #62 in other battleground states, that same criteria identified more than a thousand such "mules" in Pennsylvania, and so on.

Heh, you can tell I was pretty convinced by it, but...I admit that I already concluded there was massive election fraud. (Which is a point made by the infamous Politi"Fact" "Fact Check" done on...wait for it...the PREVIEW of the documentary!!!! In it (again, on the PREVIEW of the documentary) they said:

"...It is conspiracist thinking," he said. "They are interpreting data that confirms their pre-existing conclusions. It’s a zombie claim; no matter how many times you kill it, it keeps coming back..."

So, yes! You are spot on, and they used that even before the documentary was seen.

Well. I guess that will be the Leftist mantra, as it always seems to be. " Deny, Deny, Deny".

And there is no denying that they are banking on a sufficient number of people to simply say "Oh. I heard the documentary was debunked."

What we are banking on is that there are a sufficient number of Americans who, after seeing this compelling documentary, will look with irritated disbelief at the Leftists who say "Oh, there are innocent explanations for this activity..."

[Antoninus]

What must be said? They were in on it. Even Faux News. Duh. The last thing they want is evidence of the fraud to be made public.

[hecticskeptic]

(LOL, in telling this, it is not YOU who are the uncle, hecticskeptic, it is the Leftists who ....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of course not... there is a reason why ‘skeptic’ is part of my screen name. From the moment that WuFlu became a thing.... and the drop of boxes as the solution to voting during a so-called ‘pandemic’, it was quite apparent what they were doing. The only thing to wonder about is that since they are now exposed, what stunt are they going to replace it with... or are they going to try to bull their way through this and try something almost similar? I wouldn’t put it past them. This is why they must absolutely be crushed.

[rlmorel]

I simply could not be more in agreement.

They are going to try to bull their way through it. Not a single doubt in my mind.

Leftism in American politics should be as disreputable as Communism became in the late Forties and early Fifties.

I am not saying there shouldn’t be dissenting views. I am saying those dissenting views should come from Americans, people who buy into how this country was founded and the principles of the Constitution.

I simply don’t believe those people on the Left today meet those criteria needed to be called American.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I finally got an email from Salem that they shipped on the 13th.
Obviously not in the order they received orders.

[Charles H. (The_r0nin)]

For example, the geospatial data could show a mule stopping by a maibox at exactly the same time a ballot dropbox camera showed a mule stuffing ballots in. That did not happen once in the film.

Exactly that was shown in the film, several times. That is how they identified the times on the video to look for the mules... they state that clearly. Why are you pushing disinformation about a video you clearly didn't watch?

[rlmorel]

Sorry this is so long, but I was thinking about this a bit.

I just finished listening to Dan Bongino interview both Dinesh D'Souza and Catherine Engelbrecht, and Ms. Engelbrecht did say they had to visit at least five "Get-Out-The-Vote Non-Profits) (which I will refer to as NGO), so there is that. I will try to find out if there is an explanation why someone needed to go to at least 5 NGO organizations.

NOTE: You may also want to watch LINK: LOCAL INSURGENCIES: THE EPOCH TIMES FEATURES INTERVIEW WITH TRUE THE VOTE ABOUT WHO IS FUNDING THE BALLOT MULES

If I had to guess, it is that these NGO organizations are universally far Leftist, Community Organizer types. (There may be one here or there that is actually non-partisan or even conservative, but I am willing to bet they make up less than 5%, probably far less.)

So they are all partisan, all rowing in the same direction with the same goal. I have zero doubt that this fraud was organized and financed at a national level via the flood of money (such as ZuckBucks) flowing into the NGO organizations, but was executed at local levels.

I am guessing that these organizations all have the same goals, may even know each other, and are pooling the two valuable scarce resources which are used :

1. SCARCE RESOURCE 1: Mail-in ballots that may be easily used or manufactured ballots which they need to be far more careful with.

2. SCARCE RESOURCE 2: Mules to distribute the ill-gotten or illegally produced mail in ballots to ballot drop boxes to be deposited in small batches of 10-20 votes. (for obvious reasons, they don't want to stuff ballot boxes with thousands or even hundreds of votes at the same time. They have to be introduced in small amounts.)

What is the illegal process to produce a ballot that may be introduced into the voting process? I just don't know. I can only speculate.

Printing fake names on ballots would be risky, I would think. You need real names. You get these from the voter rolls which may be acquired legally.

And you want to get the names of people on the ballots who have not voted. This one makes sense as well, and that data is also readily available legally.

So, I assume one or both of these two things is true to explain why someone doesn't just load up their car with ballots, and may have to make more trips:

1. Ballots that are suitable for illegally introducing into the election process are in short supply and are produced somewhat on a demand basis.

2. They don't want someone loading up their car with thousands of fraudulent ballots.

If fraudulent ballots are hard to get, it is not inconceivable to me that they would pool resources, where the NGO organization would have their own teams, in their own locations either picking up unused ballots from areas, helping vulnerable people fill out their ballots, and discarding non-Biden votes, or even printing ballots on high-res copiers

They probably limit it on each mule's trip to what can be fit into a backpack, hidden and out of site. The last thing they want is a mule getting stopped by a cop (who might be a conservative) and asking "What do you have in those boxes?" What is that person going to say? Ballots? And what if the cop asks to take a look?

I have an overpowering conviction that there is some active process when the polls are open which can show who has and has not voted. You should not be able to find out who voted for a candidate, but I will bet money that in the world of digital voting (and ALL of these battleground states had digital voting) that if you have access to the systems, you can find out who has not voted. And as an IT professional who read the Antrim County forensic analysis in detail, I can assure you that anyone could get into that system. Anyone.

My guess is that they take the voter rolls and find out who is registered to vote, and if they have voted in the last four elections. If they have not participated, those votes are prioritized, fixed on official or fake ballots, and prepared for distribution according to an algorithm. If a person is 80 years old (assuming that is a valid data element available) and has not voted by 8 PM, these are likely checked against who has already voted, and any who have not yet voted will be extracted and given to a mule to stuff into boxes.

That is the Low Hanging Fruit.

All the while, they are using the electronic voting system tallies to keep count to have an idea of how many fixed ballots are needed to give their candidate a victory. They do this on an ongoing basis, and work proceeds behind the scenes by these NGO personnel to manufacture the ballots: "Here is a list. Get ballots filled out for all the voters on this list and have them ready for the next mule to come by. She should be by in about an hour."

This list is going to be higher risk. You know at this hour, it is less likely an 80 year old is going to vote, so that is pretty safe, but you have to do a risk assessment with each batch as the easy ones disappear. Perhaps you say "get me all the people aged 70-80 who haven't voted yet. Or whatever.

This all presupposes that the different NGOs may cover different areas to minimize overlap, that the DOB of a voter is available in the voter rolls, etc.

I saw evidence in the film that the overlap issue may be a real one, and that in at least one instance, they had 1,962 ballots show up in a drop box that normally drop boxes in that region may have had 40-50 ballots in them. I had no problem visualizing a screw up in communication, where only certain mules should have gone to a particular drop box, but...every mule in the area was going to that one drop box thinking it was theirs, and as a result, it was overstuffed and showed up on someone's radar...perhaps even someone who wasn't in on the fix.

I am just guessing.

But if so, it indicates coordinated organization at national, state, and county levels. And I am not the only one who thinks this.

[lucky american]

You’ll get it tomorrow.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Email says Tues.
I am anxious to see it and share it.

[rlmorel]

It is worth every cent and more.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Joe Biden told us in Oct 2020 that Obama has assembled the most comprehensive voter fraud organization in history.

It’s ACORN after it splintered into a million pieces to make tracking what they were doing more difficult.

[Maris Crane]

Nothing makes people want to see something as:

TRYING TO KEEP IT UNDER COVER.

The Media are carrying on a COVER UP just as they claimed the Republicans did in Watergate.

Now, there will slowly more and more viewers and more disgust with the Media. Win-Win.

[thecodont]

[thecodont]

Time to clean things up!