The 5 stages of arguing with a pro Putin post
1. He denies: you tell him that the Moskva sank or that Russian troops committed massacres in bucha. He demands proofs that aren’t the satellite images or the videos or the accounts from witnesses. He rejects them as Jewish in origin
2. Anger. He deigns anger and complains that we are always accusing Russia of things like Katyn etc.
3. Deflection. He then equivocated, saying “hey the USA did similar in iraq, Vietnam, etc”
4. Depression. He runs out of lies and asks why we are picking in him with facts.
5. Acceptance. Much later he laughs in your face and says he did it and you couldn’t do anything about it.
Rossiya stronk
So, I guess this post is at level 3?
“The 5 stages of arguing with a pro Putin post”
I don’t get it. What is so wrong with making a pro-Putin post, if that is what you choose to call it? Are you suggesting that our speech be censored??