Posted on 04/09/2022 2:50:29 PM PDT by navysealdad
The serial number proves that the Tochka-U missile that fell on Kramatorsk belonPhotos taken by Western journalists with Kiev's permission prove that the Tochka-U missile that attacked Kramatorsk was Ukrainian. This drew the attention of the Donetsk TV channel "Union", as well as several Telegram channels specializing in military topics. "The serial number of the Tochka-U missile, which fell on the eve of the railway station in Kramatorsk. Rocket 9M79-1, serial number SH91579. Earlier, Ukrainian militants used missiles from the same series, "the TV channel said in a statement.gs to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
(Excerpt) Read more at ria.ru ...
False-flags are Ukraine’s stock-in-trade.
Impossible. Every Ukrainian missile fired has hit a Russian target, every time! Don’t you watch the news?
Most FReepers won’t believe this. But I DO.
The pounding of the war drums has caused them to lose all rationality and they’re back to believing everything from the mainstream media.
Sounds like Obama is running the show
Sounds like Obama is running the show.
Dental floss arms couldn’t run a lemonade stand.
Such as inventory reports or an invoice showing that lot of missiles to be Ukrainian.
Because if they do not have the documentation, this is just more propaganda.
With all the ‘Wag the Dog’ Kabuki theater on both sides, as far as I know, the missile could have been a counterfeit from Luxembourg.
Uh half of you only believe certain things.
Anything is possible in war. That Ukraine blew up its own train station,I call Russian bs.
In any event, Russia has caused every single bit of this, including friendly fire losses.
Both sides are known to lie. It might have been a false flag committed by the Ukraine against itself in order to blame Russia, but, Russia might well have collected missile fragments, especially including those with the serial numbers still conveniently legible, from Ukrainian attacks on its soil, and placed - and then conveniently “found” - those fragments in the train station after the attack. There is no good evidentiary chain of custody in military attacks, and both sides have strong incentives to lie.
By way of example, note that the FBI lied for 6 years that they never used any pyrotechnic devices during the Waco massacre (1993), but then admitted that they had. They also “lost” the door they claimed was “bowed out” by Davidians firing outwards, and they also claimed that the said spent pyrotechnic devices were actually illegal silencers possessed and used by the Davidians, partially justifying the attack.
It was American planes that crashed into the World Trade Center on 9-11.
Oh my, more BS from Ukraine and Biden’s biys
Could have been made in Ukraine, sold to Russia who sent it back. Russia was getting a lot of military equipment made for them in the Ukraine.
Sounds like whoever was shoveling the shit from both sides at the American people during the first two years of our recent pandemic is the same one shoveling the shit at us now....again, from both sides.
Getting pretty damned tired of TPTB treating us like mushrooms!
I don’t believe this and have not read here anyone calling for war. The Russians cannot even be trusted with the Olympics ffs.
I just read this stuff and don't believe anything. Its like asking us who is more credible CNN or MSNBC.
Neither has any credibility its best to just assume everyone is lying to you because they are. There is some incite in watching who CNN and MSNBS is reporting as credible sources however, so you can discount them out of hand.
There is not need to create false Russian attacks against civilians. They are real and documented.
As an aside the Brits burned cities to the ground in WWII with great civilian casualties in fire raids, as we did in Japan with atomic bombs and our fire raids. It worked. That is what war is. My comment is not justification of such. It is just a comment on the reality of war. It is ugly. You kill your enemy and all that support him. It is not pretty.
War is bad, but sometimes the alternative is worse.
Sanctions against a combatant and military assistance to one of the combatants are both acts of war according to international law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.