Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyer charged in Durham case asks to block dossier evidence
The Associated Press ^ | April 5, 2022 | By ERIC TUCKER

Posted on 04/05/2022 2:26:47 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON (AP) — A lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign charged with lying to the FBI during the Trump-Russia investigation is asking a judge to block from his upcoming trial evidence or testimony related to a dossier of uncorroborated allegations compiled by an-ex British spy.

Attorneys for Michael Sussmann said prosecutors on special counsel John Durham’s team told them last month that they plan to introduce testimony related to the so-called “Steele dossier,” a collection of Democratic-funded research assembled by former British operative Christopher Steele that purported to link Donald Trump to Russia. The dossier contains unproven and discredited assertions but the FBI relied on it in part as agents applied for secret surveillance warrants during the Russia investigation.

Sussmann’s attorneys argued in a Monday night filing that the Steele dossier is irrelevant to the case against their client, and that testimony about it at a trial scheduled for next month would be inflammatory and prejudicial.

“Any modicum of relevance would be so substantially outweighed by risk of confusion, delay, waste, and unfair prejudice as to require this evidence be precluded,” Sussmann’s attorneys wrote, telling U.S. District Judge Christopher “Casey” Cooper that Durham’s team should not be permitted to turn the trial “into a circus full of sideshows that will only fuel partisan fervor.”

The motion is one of several from both prosecutors and defense lawyers aimed at shaping the scope of evidence for a trial that is expected to be closely watched and politically charged. In seeking to preclude testimony related to the dossier, Sussmann’s attorneys are looking to head off discussion before the jury about one of the more incendiary and divisive aspects of the entire Russia investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christophersteele; clinton; clintoncampaign; clintonlawyer; collusion; democrats; deripaska; durham; edpionage; election2016; espionage; hillaryclinton; journalism; media; press; russia; russiagate; russiagatetimeline; russiahoax; spies; spooks; steeledossier; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: dead

I know! So NOW it’s discredited and unproven! It was that way 2 years ago as well! Must be some legal trick to save Hillary


21 posted on 04/05/2022 3:37:41 PM PDT by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

We know who the king pins are and they still walk free today and will die of old age never to be prosecuted


22 posted on 04/05/2022 3:41:55 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pangaea6

The really bad part is that the GOP leadership knew by June of 2017 (by Trey Gowdy’s admission) that it was junk and yet continued to assist the Democrats to keep it going long after that.


23 posted on 04/05/2022 4:06:01 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

“who told you to put the balm on?


24 posted on 04/05/2022 4:24:10 PM PDT by redshawk ( I want my red balloon. https://youtu.be/VexKSRKoWQY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

It’s a sham.
It’s a mockery.
It’s two shams of a mockery of a sham.


25 posted on 04/05/2022 4:43:57 PM PDT by _longranger81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nobody’s actually been charged with conspiracy though, so it remains to be seen how much leeway a judge will give him based on that.


26 posted on 04/06/2022 7:37:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson