Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
There was a modified form of ballot harvesting in Wisconsin.

It was strictly forbidden by state law.

The case, after the election, went all the way to the state Supreme Court, which had a 4-3 Conservative/Leftist split. One of the "Conservatives" Justice Brian Hagedorn, sided with the three leftists in saying they could not throw out the ballots after the election, because it would be too disruptive.

"Striking these votes now — after the election, and in only two of Wisconsin's 72 counties when the disputed practices were followed by hundreds of thousands of absentee voters statewide — would be an extraordinary step for this court to take. We will not do so."

This followed the situation seen nationwide. Before the election, lawsuits favoring Trump were said to be "too early". After the election, lawsuits were said to be "too late".

The Republican lawsuits were never "just right".

5 posted on 01/11/2022 6:24:12 AM PST by marktwain (Amazing people can read a persons entire personality and character from one photograph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

“Goldilocks lawsuits”


12 posted on 01/11/2022 6:46:01 AM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Same for lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. Apparently when the shadow government decides that an issue is not for the judiciary to consider, they are able to get every single black robe in the country to fall in line and cower before their decision.

If that’s not the case, then it’s certainly how it appears to an outside observer.


24 posted on 01/11/2022 9:12:10 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson