Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Minimum, Sotomayor Should Recuse Herself From All Decisions Regarding COVID
The Epoch Times ^ | January 9, 2022 | Roger L. Simon

Posted on 01/10/2022 8:03:20 AM PST by george76

Sonia Sotomayor’s ludicrous claim before her Supreme Court peers during oral arguments that one hundred thousand children were “in serious condition” from COVID-19 when three thousand would have been more accurate, is far more than just an embarrassment to the justice.

How could such an ill-informed person be a justice of our highest court? What else doesn’t she know—or, perhaps more exactly, doesn’t want to know?

Her full quotation makes it sound still worse.

“We have hospitals that are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators. We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators.”

None of those are true. We are currently going through a bump in cases of the vastly weaker Omicron variant, which many have compared to a cold and in the vast majority of instances can be treated at home with therapeutics.

Even extreme vaccine enthusiast CDC director Rochelle Wallensky admitted that hospitalizations for other age groups were fifteen fold greater than the pediatric—and those weren’t much.

Sotomayor wasn’t alone on the court with her what some might euphemistically call “mischaracterization.”

Justice Stephen Breyer claimed “750 million new cases” of coronavirus had been reported in our country when the entire population is well less than half that.

Can you get two cases of COVID-19 at once? Who’d a thunk it?

What’s going on here? Are the two Supreme Court justices taking stupid pills? Is the “Wise Latina” not so wise after all?

She may not be a legal genius but that’s not the problem. The problem is what I have called “want-to-believe.”

Sotomayor and Breyer are so convinced of liberal/conservative ideology that they are unable even to see the arguments of the other side, sometimes to the extent that they do not even know they are there, that they exist.

This is even true when the arguments are about science, not politics—when facts, not opinions, are most important.

Have either of these people—Supreme Court justices who must have known for months that they were going to have to rule on matters concerning COVID—read any of the books on the subject by Alex Berenson, Dr. Scott Atlas, or Robert F. Kennedy Jr., himself obviously a liberal? Have they viewed any of the detailed videos made by Drs. Peter McCullough and Robert Malone, some available right here on The Epoch Times, warning of the significant dangers of vaccinating children with barely tested mRNA? (Malone, incidentally, was one of the mRNA vaccine inventors.)

Have they even read the Great Barrington Declaration? Do they know who signed it or what their backgrounds were (Harvard, Oxford and Stanford, among others)? Do they even know what it is?

In all probability, the answer to most, possibly all, of these questions is no. It is for almost every liberal or progressive I know. They are bathed in what are deemed the proper morally narcissistic views by the New York Times and CNN and accept them like automatons. Ignorance is bliss, as they say.

In the case of COVID, this kind of extreme ignorance has left dead bodies across the globe. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin be damned, even if they save millions of people. After all, Trump recommended them. They have to be bad.

Can you imagine anything more idiotic, less scientific? But that’s where we are on our Supreme Court, of all places, the new haven of know-nothingism. Mere bias wasn’t enough.

Sotomayor should obviously recuse herself from all matters regarding COVID.

She won’t. The American left—straight up to SCOTUS justices apparently—is suffused with a belief that everything they say is automatically correct, whatever they think ought to be to be true is true.

Sotomayor may not make a blunder as obvious as this one again, but the thought process—or lack thereof—that led to it will not change.

You might call it the anti-scientific method.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; cdc; claim; diversity; justice; ludicrous; ludicrousclaim; scotus; sonia; soniasotomayor; sotomayor; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2022 8:03:20 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

I don’t think this was a slip of the tongue OR being misinformed. I think these things were said purposely to mislead.

That’s what libs do.


2 posted on 01/10/2022 8:05:55 AM PST by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

At maximum she should be kicked off the Supreme Court by the other members.

She is stupid, didn’t check the stuff coming out of her mouth, proved that she was implicitly prejudiced against the case, and tried to influence a decision they were making with false information. The members of the court should impeach her themselves.


3 posted on 01/10/2022 8:06:51 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Has any high-profile leftist ever recused themselves?


4 posted on 01/10/2022 8:07:04 AM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

Kagan should get the same treatment - including removal from the Supreme Court ...


5 posted on 01/10/2022 8:11:45 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

she’s stupid, ignorant or lying.

which is best?


6 posted on 01/10/2022 8:12:35 AM PST by wny ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woweeitsme

Dunno...never underestimate the power of stupidity!
Even Laurence Tribe made disparaging comments regarding the “Wide Latina’s” intellect.


7 posted on 01/10/2022 8:12:58 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

This is what “diversity” gets us.

Never mind the actual qualifications for the job.


8 posted on 01/10/2022 8:13:35 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

When that POS hit the court, the dems achieved their goal, they really packed the court.


9 posted on 01/10/2022 8:14:44 AM PST by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

Procedure for impeaching a USSC judge (or any federal judge see Alcee Hastings! I am amazed he was actually removed!) is the same as a president. It’s not going to happen.


10 posted on 01/10/2022 8:16:37 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

Affirmative Action SCOTUS justice.


11 posted on 01/10/2022 8:16:41 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m much more concerned about the she seems puzzled by the fact that under the form of government designed by our Constitution, that states actually have powers denied to the Federal government.

I don’t expect a Supreme Court Justice to be all that knowledgable about medical matters, but Federalism?


12 posted on 01/10/2022 8:17:10 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

“recuse herself”

Whose going to make her?

You want to take on the deep state?


13 posted on 01/10/2022 8:17:45 AM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

Appointed by the Obama-ron. Low intelligence score.


14 posted on 01/10/2022 8:18:09 AM PST by fivecatsandadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Never mind the actual qualifications for the job.

Elena Kagan was never even a judge before the Supreme Court.
15 posted on 01/10/2022 8:19:17 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

You don’t need to ever have been a judge to be on the Supreme Court. You don’t need to have gone to law school either.


16 posted on 01/10/2022 8:23:24 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: george76

Her recent comparison of unborn children with brain dead people should have been the end of her credibility. The media had no problem with it.


17 posted on 01/10/2022 8:23:41 AM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Actually, you don't need to be familiar with any medical opinions about COVID to be able to recognize that Biden's exercise of executive power via mandates is unconstitutional. It's a Constitutional matter, not a medical one. Clearly, the Constitution does not grant Biden the executive power to force a medical procedure upon WE THE PEOPLE.

If the Latina were truly wise, she would be able to recognize that - regardless of the extent of her knowledge about COVID.

18 posted on 01/10/2022 8:24:50 AM PST by McBuff (To be, rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

That’s where the Senate is supposed to come in and question the qualifications of a justice.


19 posted on 01/10/2022 8:26:15 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george76

She should be impeached for incompetence


20 posted on 01/10/2022 8:26:41 AM PST by vigilante2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson