Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
Posted on 12/08/2021 11:40:07 AM PST by MarvinStinson
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci said Wednesday on CNN’s “At This Hour” that it was a matter of “when not if” the definition of fully vaccinated will change to include a third booster shot.
Bolduan said, “Pfizer’s chief scientific officer said this morning on CNN that he thinks fully vaccinated against Omicron, it means three doses. Do you think the definition of fully vaccinated should now change?”
AD Fauci said, “Well, you know, as you say, it’s a technical, almost semantic definition. And it is the definition for requirements if someone says, are you fully vaccinated to be able to attend class in a university or college or be able to work in a workplace? Right now, Kate, I don’t see that changing tomorrow or this week, or next week. But certainly, when you want to talk about optimal protection, I don’t think anyone would argue that optimal protection is with a third shot. Whether or not it officially gets changed in the definition, I think that will be considered literally on a daily basis. That’s always on the table.”
Bolduan said, “This discussion has been going on for a bit. With this data coming in this morning, I’m kind of stuck with is it a matter now of when, not if, the definition of fully vaccinated changes?”
Fauci said, “My own personal opinion, Kate, is what you said is correct. It’s going to be a matter of when, not if.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
STFU! Jesus, you’re tiring.
What was it? Two weeks to flatten the curve?
Then, 4, 5, 6 - you get point. And Pfizer laughs all the way to the bank. Wake up people.
So says the salesperson of the century for big pharma.... an award he shares with Bill Gates who despite billions was never able to design an operating system that did not crash or was invulnerable to viruses.
Let this all sink in..........
I’m waiting for when, not if, this gnome disappears....
For those like me with the vax cards, just make sure you check the dates before filling the card in for “proof” of your “vaccination”. Not that they check anyway.
The non-boosted Mudbloods will become just like us Pureblood scum!
Will the Vaxxcamps have different compounds for nobooster, 1 booster, 2 booster and totally unvaxxed?
The Fear Gnome speaks.
You’re an idiot.
Why the Hell are you playing their sick game?
God, why is this being allowed to happen?
It’s pretty obvious that the first two jabs were a fail! The third shot will be a fail. These are not vaccines!
And, don’t forget your monthly boosters. Which are for the most part just #3 of the original and on in to perpetuity. In order to pass away, you first have to be certified vaxxed. After all, only those that have been vaxxed are allowed to choose euthanasia in ‘chermunee’ these days.
Everybody here should shut up and get your three boosters.
Otherwise you are against ‘science’.
Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
“It’s pretty obvious that the first two jabs were a fail”
Good point.
“It’s pretty obvious that the first two jabs were a fail”
Good point.
By hook or by crook, the superstate will reduce underfunded liabilities. Why? The Government would have to stop spending! Beasts do two things: survive, and eat. Useless eaters are what’s for dinner.
When, not if, he gets to ambient temperature.
There has never been a proper attempt to define an adequate primary series with any of the available vaccines.
Everybody knows every vaccine has a primary series, right? DPT is 2,4,6, and 18 months, hepatitis B is 0, 1, and 6 months, measles is 15 months, 4 years, and 12 years...and so on.
Calling the third Pfizer or Moderna shot a “booster” is an attempt to avoid discussion of why the issue of defining a primary series was not taken up as part of the Phase III studies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.