To: Regulator
"Can the president use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines on the employees of federal contractors and subcontractors? In all likelihood, the answer to that question is no." Thus, he granted the preliminary injunction requested by Ohio's, Kentucky's, and Tennessee's attorneys general."
It's not mentioned but did this judge make it a commerce clause issue ?
and is he using CJ Roberts' Obamacare ruling on it?
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS concluded in Part III–A that the individual mandate is not a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause...The individual mandate, however, does not regulate existing commercial activity. It instead compels individuals to become active in commerce bypurchasing a product, on the ground that their failure to do so affects interstate commerce. Construing the Commerce Clause to permit Congress to regulate individuals precisely because they are doing nothing would open a new and potentially vast domain to congressional authority.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-393c3a2.pdf
page 2
19 posted on
12/02/2021 10:18:23 AM PST by
stylin19a
(What's the job application like at Hooters? they just give you a bra and say, Here fill this out ?)
To: stylin19a
It could come out that way, but I don’t think Roberts opinion was necessary. Just an understanding of the separation of powers...
34 posted on
12/02/2021 1:15:07 PM PST by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson