Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rittenhouse Trial Underscores the Left’s Determination to Eliminate the Natural Right of Self-Defense
American Thinker.com ^ | November 22, 2021 | Steve McCann

Posted on 11/22/2021 2:20:17 AM PST by Kaslin

The American left’s determination to conduct a media-inspired political trial of Kyle Rittenhouse had as its objective the ultimate disarming of Americans and the elimination of the Second Amendment. While Kyle Rittenhouse was listed as the defendant, it was the right of self-defense that was on trial.

To what extent does man have a natural or God-given right to self-defense and protection of himself and his property? This question has been bandied about for thousands of years and that issue, not guns (which are an instrument of self-defense), is at the heart of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The United States is the only nation in the annals of mankind to be established on the basis of a political and social philosophy centered on natural, or God-given, rights. Among these are self-defense and property. Property rights are the bedrock of the American political system; without that foundation, there is no freedom.

The Founders held that property rights encompass not just physical property but also one’s life, labor, speech, and livelihood, as individuals own their own lives; therefore, they must own the products of that life which can be traded in free exchange with others. Further, as there is a natural right of self-preservation, man has the right and duty to defend himself against transgressors, including the state, that would deny, abrogate, or unlawfully seize his property.

However, over the past 160 years, the statists, including the current iteration of the American left, have marched in lock step to what Karl Marx espoused in his Communist Manifesto -- “The Theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: communism; kylerittenhouse

1 posted on 11/22/2021 2:20:17 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not for them.

They have rights. We don’t.


2 posted on 11/22/2021 2:23:18 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Only certain groups can defend themselves. Kyle doesn’t belong to any of them.


3 posted on 11/22/2021 2:27:24 AM PST by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
" The Rittenhouse Trial Underscores the Left’s Determination to Eliminate the Natural Right "


fixed

4 posted on 11/22/2021 2:28:33 AM PST by knarf (?<p>Little kids grow up to be adults that get into powerful positions and act out their thoughts.<pg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
You can't enslave people if they are able to defend themselves.

You can't enact the globalist's agenda if you can't enslave the people.

5 posted on 11/22/2021 2:36:25 AM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. NEVER be a peaceful quiet slave in a newe socialist America.66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Left wants mob rule because they control the mob.


6 posted on 11/22/2021 2:38:22 AM PST by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

the right of the individual to say no is the bottom question.

to ztand as an individual, with their thought as paramount, is a danger to anyone who thinks that he or she has a smidgeon of control.


7 posted on 11/22/2021 2:39:15 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Correct. It’s not that they’re against a particular freedom but rather they’re against your exercise of that freedom. Their ideal society has a thin elite class at the top with unlimited freedom, access to resources etc. Below them is the thick slave class. I say slave rather than servant because the elites view the peoples of this class as objects for their pleasures whatever those might be.


8 posted on 11/22/2021 2:43:17 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t think it’s even the right to self-defense they are after.

It’s the Second Amendment and gun ownership they want.

They do NOT want us armed.


9 posted on 11/22/2021 4:42:48 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 556x45

You are right.

Slave class.

We are only a commodity to them, a means to their end.


10 posted on 11/22/2021 4:44:26 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

.


11 posted on 11/22/2021 4:57:22 AM PST by sauropod (Meanie Butt Daddy - No you can't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

In 1931, Weimar authorities discovered plans for a Nazi takeover in which Jews would be denied food and persons refusing to surrender their guns within 24 hours would be executed. They were written by Werner Best, a future Gestapo official. In reaction to such threats, the government authorized the registration of all firearms and the confiscation thereof, if required for “public safety.” The interior minister warned that the records must not fall into the hands of any extremist group.
In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm, and attack political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches for and seizures of guns and dissident publications ensued. Police revoked gun licenses of Social Democrats and others who were not “politically reliable.”


12 posted on 11/22/2021 5:11:21 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just think if we would have submitted to gun confiscation where would we be? We are still a tolerant bunch but patience is running thin. Do these retards have any idea what happeneds if and when the flood gate opens?


13 posted on 11/22/2021 5:59:19 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

The root of their animus is

unalienable rights

AKA

GOD given rights.

It’s GOD

and those that beleive in Him

they are out to eliminate.


14 posted on 11/22/2021 6:12:07 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
To what extent does man have a natural or God-given right to self-defense and protection of himself and his property?

AND HIS PROPERTY !

These days (since Mayor Lindsey?) it seems to me that a thief has a greater right to my property than I have to his life.

ML/NJ

15 posted on 11/22/2021 7:42:59 AM PST by ml/nj ("If the Representatives of the People betray their Constituents ..." Federalist #28; READ IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If the democrats get their race war it’s the ticket to remove guns from the public free speech is almost done with now.


16 posted on 11/22/2021 9:30:40 AM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It shows the left’s determination to allow the legal killing of white people by their terrorist organizations.


17 posted on 11/22/2021 10:26:54 AM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Call it what you want, I call it a major victory for upholding our right to self defense. For that I am thankful that the jury did the right and correct thing with their ruling. I can’t imagine how the Left wants to corrupt our judicial system for political outcomes, it’s scary.


18 posted on 11/22/2021 10:31:20 AM PST by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson