Posted on 11/20/2021 6:07:23 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
Attorneys representing Gaige Grosskreutz and the Estate of Joseph Rosenbaum spoke out on Friday.
After Kyle Rittenhouse was fully acquitted on five charges, they said their clients acted "heroically."
"They did not seek violence, but to end violence," the attorneys said in a statement sent to Insider.
Attorneys representing Gaige Grosskreutz and the estate of Joseph Rosenbaum, two men shot by Kyle Rittenhouse in August 2020, said that their clients acted "heroically" and "did not seek violence, but to end violence."
On Friday, a jury fully acquitted Rittenhouse on five counts, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, first-degree attempted intentional homicide, and two counts of first-degree reckless endangerment.
Rittenhouse was charged with fatally shooting two men, Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and charged with injuring Gaige Grosskreutz on August 25, 2020.
"Today we grieve for the families of those slain by Kyle Rittenhouse," Kimberley Motley and Milo Schwab, attorneys for Gaige Grosskreutz and the estate of Joseph Rosenbaum, told Insider in a statement. "Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum did not deserve to die that night. For now, we ask for peace from everyone hurting and that the public respect the privacy of the victims and their families."
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Wish the parents of the molested kids would be asked their opinions.
Pedophile is too nice of a word. Child rapist is a better term here.
Gaige Grosskruetz, Maurice Freeland and Ziminski all should be criminally charged and tried.
“They did not seek violence, but to end violence,”
The same could be said about Kyle.
“That’s called vigilantism.”
To me that is the sad part about Kyle being labeled a vigilante. It was these two morons who wanted to kill Kyle without knowing all the facts of the first shooting that are the vigilante. They would have not been harmed and likely no trial, if they had just followed and reported Kyle to the police.
“why they needed to be on the street causing or prompting violence. Could they have been adrenaline junkies and people who thrive on chaos?”
I read this article not too long ago that reinforced some of the points that describe psychopathic behavior.
[Paraphrased] really not giving a care or thought about anything, nothing, not even themselves and conducting themselves in any way that they, themselves want to and even afterwards not caring. Violently or not.
That is psychopathic behavior.
The rest of the article went into a historical analysis of what scientists have pondered and have analyzed and have hypothesized about and this article was kind of hitting on nutritional imbalances when they were young and up-and-coming as a possible link but that’s all theoretical hypothesis.
Can or cannot Psychologist’s proof out human thought? I would think observationally yes, but not mathematically. What does the study of human thought and behaviours use as the tools for their validation.
Perhaps, its a case of “there’s nothing new under the sun” when human behaviours, and thoughts are concerned. Recognizing behaviors might be worth a bit of a study up.
Yup.
Nobody believes you, your clients were dirtbags and everybody knows it.
All they had to do was walk about 50 (75?) yards down the street with Kyle where the police were massed in several vehicles.
Everyone knows why none of those people wanted to walk down to the police.
“They did not seek violence, but to end violence,” the attorneys said in a statement sent to Insider.
Well that makes sense as to why one was bouncing a skateboard off of Rittenhouse head and the other was pointing a gun at him. That prosecution will be more pathetic than the last one.
Nobody believes you, your clients were dirtbags and everybody knows it.
.
.
Yep. This man and his criminal clients will only get traction by the leftist goons in the media and celebrity world.
Brandon, Harris, Nadler, Binger, Kraus
Um...it sure looks like it all has been uncovered and those responsible have already been brought to account. A few have even met their maker...perhaps a little earlier than they would have liked.
What’s the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?
One’s a scum-sucking bottom dweller and the other one is a fish.
Those damn inanimate objects acting on their own accord.
“They did not seek violence, but to end violence,” the attorneys said in a statement sent to Insider.
I understand standing up for your client but this is like a joke. only not funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.