Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warren: SCOTUS ‘an Extremist’ Court Willing to ‘Take a Shot at Roe v. Wade’
Briedbart ^ | 10/25/2021 | Trent Baker

Posted on 10/25/2021 8:27:25 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

This week on MSNBC’s “The Sunday Show,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) slammed the U.S. Supreme Court as an “extremist court” that was “out of step with the American people.”

Host Jonathan Capehart aired a clip of a Democratic Texas state representative lamenting that the Supreme Court was acting like abortion was “an issue that we need to vacillate over.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: abortion; brietbart; court; demagogicparty; elizabethwarren; extremist; jonathancapehart; massachusetts; mediawingofthednc; msnbc; obamacare; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; plannedparenthood; righttolife; scotus; texas; tomahawkliz; trentbaker; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Extremist Scotus? Good one dummie.
1 posted on 10/25/2021 8:27:25 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Elections have consequences.


2 posted on 10/25/2021 8:29:43 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Damned shame Warren wasn’t aborted.


3 posted on 10/25/2021 8:29:51 AM PDT by MercyFlush (IT’S NOT A VACCINE. Once you accept this then everything else starts to make sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Part of the right wing cabal no doubt. Back to your hogan assclown. Which tribe again? The Fugawee tribe?


4 posted on 10/25/2021 8:29:58 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Oh, how I wish the SCOTUS were as right-wing as it is in the fevered imagination of the leftist/media establishment.

Sadly, we have maybe three genuine conservatives, a couple of timid moderates, and they’re all led by a treacherous Chief who lacks any sort of consistent judicial philosophy other than his own opportunism.


5 posted on 10/25/2021 8:33:34 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Elizabeth Warren, the woman who committed fraud to obtain scholarships for Native Americans, has the gall to comment on anything involving law and the courts?

She considers overturning Roe v. Wade as "extremist" but murdering millions of children is not?

6 posted on 10/25/2021 8:34:13 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

First, I have no illusion that the current SCOTUS will overturn Roe

Second, since when is defending life that is innocent extremist?


7 posted on 10/25/2021 8:40:36 AM PDT by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) slammed the U.S. Supreme Court as an “extremist court” that was “out of step with the American people.”
***That happened in 2008 when SCOTUS refused to do their job and determine the constitutional requirements of Natural Born Citizen, which definition had been held for more than 200 years as ‘born on US soil to 2 US citizen parents’. When SCOTUS told the entire country that NONE of us had standing in Berg vs. Obama, that was the official changing of this nation into an oligarchy. It is very similar to the historically accepted threshold when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon river and started the Roman civil war, thus ending the Roman republic and starting the Roman Empire.

The reason why SCOTUS is given lifetime appointment is so they can be protected from the political ramifications of their decisions, but they regularly BASE their decisions on political ramifications. In particular, they have inserted their voice where it was clearly states’ rights issues such as abortion but here they REFUSED to do their job when it was obviously theirs to do.


8 posted on 10/25/2021 8:43:50 AM PDT by Kevmo (I’m immune from Covid since I don’t watch TV.🤗)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Glad to be out of step with the people who take the extreme position that killing babies is a normal and good thing. Abortion is evil. Warren is evil.


9 posted on 10/25/2021 8:51:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Hey Liz!

Have you ever considered that is the BABY KILLERS who are the "Extremists"?

10 posted on 10/25/2021 8:57:59 AM PDT by G Larry (I speak to be precise and refusing to change doesn't mean you can assign imprecise labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Nothing about the extremist court that read between the lines to invent the concept of abortion as a right.


11 posted on 10/25/2021 9:02:16 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

...because the right to murder one’s children is right there in the Constitution. /s

On the contrary, it is not. In fact, the Tenth Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Nowhere does the Constitution say that Supreme Court must base their rulings on what’s in “step with the American people.”


12 posted on 10/25/2021 9:03:35 AM PDT by nagant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27; All
""Warren: SCOTUS ‘an Extremist [??? emphasis added]’ Court Willing to ‘Take a Shot at Roe v. Wade’""
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Sen. Warren needs to be on the short list of senators who would make the best poster child for why the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A) should never have been ratified imo.

More specifically, Sen. Warren seems to be clueless to the fact that, in stark contrast to the rights that the early states famously expressly protected in the Bill of Rights, it remains that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the murder of unborn children as a right.

In other words, Constitution-ignoring activist justices confirmed by misguided, post-17A senators like Warren wrongly established the politically correct right to murder unborn children.

Insights welcome.

The ultimate remedy for unconstitutionally big, Democratic-pirated federal and state governments oppressing everybody under their boots...

Consider that all the states can effectively “secede” from the unconstitutionally big federal government by doing the following.

Patriots need to primary federal and state elected officials who don't send voters email ASAP that clearly promises to do the following.

Federal and state candidate lawmakers need to promise in their emails to introduce resolutions no later than 100 days after start of new legislative sessions that proposes an amendment to the Constitution to the states that is limited to repealing the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.

Again, insights welcome.

13 posted on 10/25/2021 9:09:32 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Liz Warren is a lying fake Indian who used a made-up minority biography to get special government discounts to college and jobs.

Investigate, charge, try and sentence her.


14 posted on 10/25/2021 9:19:15 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Guessing SCOTUS shouldn’t have overturned the issue of separate but equal or if slaves were people.


15 posted on 10/25/2021 9:23:34 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

An ‘extremist court’ according to a Marxist is indeed accurate.


16 posted on 10/25/2021 9:31:01 AM PDT by Bellagio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Liz channeling Earl.

Just in time for Halloween.

17 posted on 10/25/2021 9:38:06 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Seems odd to me that anyone would take a position calling a group that MAY make a move to preserve life “extremist.”


18 posted on 10/25/2021 10:07:58 AM PDT by NicoDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Slinging Bull chats with an MSNBC partisan media shill.

19 posted on 10/25/2021 10:31:49 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Gray Beaver speak with forked tongue.


20 posted on 10/25/2021 11:13:34 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson