Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Grant was clearly the best general in American history. Lee was an excellent tactical general in the Napoleonic tradition. Grant was perhaps the first modern general and a much better strategic thinker. His reputation is slowly rising to its proper place as the stain on his reputation soiled by a hundred years of Lost Cause revisionism has been washed away.

That being said, while I have mixed emotions about statues of Confederate heroes, I do not support this fever to remove them.


26 posted on 09/08/2021 6:52:49 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie

Lord where to being how full of shite you have always been sweetie


68 posted on 09/08/2021 7:33:26 AM PDT by wardaddy (Fear Republic land of grumps and scolds peppered with good folks )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I am beyond scared, as I must admit, by this “rush” to remove statues depicting historical figures who happen to have fallen out of favor with the left.

If you ask me, it had been a great act of magnanimity by the Northern victors to have Southerners put up statues of their military leaders after the WBS had ended.

Dear Southerners, please do accept my assurance that in no way is it my intention to cause you any hurt and pain, but the victors, after some time, came around to realize that the whole nation needed a “healing process” after all the horrors of the war - this is exactly that what was never done in Europe after the last wars (thus the hatred between peoples lingers on for the most part).

And now, old wounds are needlessly ripped open again, or so it seems to me (from the other side of the pond).

Beyond horrible, imho :-(


169 posted on 09/08/2021 11:10:48 PM PDT by Menes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Lee was a great and honorable man, and a very good general; he was able to do more with less in the Army of Northern Virginia than just about anyone else could have. He was aided in this by some outstanding subordinates like A.P. Hill, Stonewall Jackson, and J.E.B. Stuart, especially Jackson. Was Lee perfect? No, he made some serious mistakes, but few if any others could have done what he did overall for the South.

Grant may not have been Lee’s equal in the great-and-honorable department, and he may not have been as good a tactical general, but he was the RIGHT general for the Union at the right time. He realized that the Union’s biggest advantage was its mass and firepower and that the best way to handle Lee was not to fight on the South’s terms, but to use that overwhelming numerical advantage to grind them down. And he had the cojones to stick with his strategy even in the face of some losses and appalling casualties, because he knew it was the right one. And it was. Plus he also had some very able subordinates who thought the same way, like Sherman and Sheridan. Grant, in a way, was a better general for the evolving method of mass industrial warfare. Lee was more of an old-school general whose time was ending.

}:-)4


172 posted on 09/09/2021 9:41:27 AM PDT by Moose4 (Tree of liberty. Water as needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson