Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Everyone Should Be Allowed to Achieve Wealth
Townhall. com ^ | September 3, 2021 | Derrick Parks

Posted on 09/03/2021 8:55:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

As a former assistant chief of police and founder of a company that provides security services, I thought I knew much about the business of protecting people. But career politicians in Washington are giving all of us a masterclass in how to safeguard the interests of ultra-wealthy and powerful people like themselves through a multi pronged expansion of the death tax. If passed, the effort would destroy American jobs, eliminate incentives for small and family-owned businesses to grow, as well as further cement the status of society's most elite echelon.

The provisions of concern – a reduction in the federal estate tax exemption level and repeal of the so-called “stepped-up in basis” – can be found in the prevailing $3.5 trillion budget package that’s receiving much criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike. As an important Wall Street Journal column on how the White House’s new death tax proposals “would hit some modest estates especially hard” makes clear, “while most Americans can pass wealth to their heirs without incurring federal taxes, ‘the wealthiest’ can’t.” Indeed,“the [current] federal estate tax applies when the person who has died has a net worth of $11.7 million or more (or twice that for married couples), and it rises to 40 percent after the first $1 million in taxable assets.” Yet,“Mr. Biden’s American Families Plan would subject many estates worth far less than $11.7 million to a punishing new death tax.”Lowering the current $11.7 million estate and gift tax exemption threshold by a full 70 percent would, therefore, “result in more tax for many families at death.”

Perhaps the only thing worse than saddling widows and loved ones of modest decedents with a new death tax that’s currently reserved for the wealthy: doing so under the guise of the “American Families Plan.”

Meanwhile, on a parallel basis, President Biden’s plan to eliminate the step-up in basis would impose crushing consequences on family businesses – which account for 83.3 million American jobs and 54 percent of private sector GDP – the workers they employ, and the American economy at large. For context, family-owned businesses and farms have long been shielded from crippling tax bills when a relative passes away. That’s because the step-up in basis provision of the current code rightfully ensures that those who inherit assets are not taxed on the appreciation, including simple inflation, accrued by the prior owner or previous generations of owners.

The outpouring of concern over President Biden’s plan to repeal this critically important protection for small businesses spans the ideological spectrum – from the entire Senate Republican caucus to more than a dozen House Democrats. Here’s why: a repeal of the provision would present scores of small businesses with large tax bills – as well as the difficult decision of how to pay for it; of whether to close their doors or lay off their employees.Forcing small business owners who experienced a recent death in the family to choose between paying hefty new tax bills – which supplement, rather than replace, any existing tax liability – and paying workers in any climate is reckless. Forcing small business owners to do so in this climate is ruthless.

Moreover, as the foregoing group of Democrats wrote in a recent letter to Speaker Pelosi, “since farms, machinery, and some small businesses may be illiquid or difficult to value, the administrative difficulty is increased” – and, as Senate Republicans continue, “making these changes could force business operators to sell property…just to cover these new tax obligations.”

The costly consequences of a step-up in basis repeal are just as acute for the nation’s economy as they may well be for your family. Per a recent E&Y study, the move would result in 80,000 fewer American jobs annually over the next decade, cost an additional 100,000 jobs per year thereafter, and decrease GDP by approximately $10 billion each year for a total of $100 billion over the course of 10 years. And for every $100 of revenue raised via the repeal, $32 would come from workers’ pockets in the form of lower wages.

Accordingly, as our country works to rebuild on the heels of historic crises and in the throes of a daunting surge of new cases caused by the Delta variant, President Biden should listen to the chorus of concern among lawmakers of both political parties regarding the devastating impacts of his new death tax proposals. Rather than building our economy back better, I fear the ill-named “American Families Plan” would only build a greater – and perhaps even impenetrable – barrier between descendants at the very top who already qualify for the federal estate tax and families of more modest means who would suddenly be subjected to severe new tax liabilities.

Lawmakers should reject these proposals with the decisiveness these families – along with the tens of thousands of American workers whose jobs would be terminated – deserve.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: americanfamplan; bidenomics; biggovernment; deathtax; smallbusiness; taxes

1 posted on 09/03/2021 8:55:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Everyone Should Be Allowed to Achieve Wealth

Wealth is a relative thing.

2 posted on 09/03/2021 8:56:56 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

impacts of his new death tax proposals.


Eliminating the death tax has been the cry of the people for a long time, especially republicans and farmers.

The Inheritance tax which is so high and NO ONE of any brains pays it, is how you document the stepped up basis.

BUT NO, WE NEED TO GET RID OF THE INHERITANCE TAX.

Folks, you got your wish.

Now again what is not mentioned is that if you want to keep the family business going, there is Special Use Valuation to keep the estate low.

The other truth is that the heirs don’t want to keep the family business going. They want the cash.


3 posted on 09/03/2021 9:02:39 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The wealth exists because private citizens build it. The govt builds no wealth, it consumes it, usually wastefully.

The more the govt controls, the less the citizens control. The less the citizens control, the less wealth the citizens can build.


4 posted on 09/03/2021 9:04:18 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods ( comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I seem to remember some prominent demo-commie (I think it was Hillary) saying, “How much wealth should a person be ALLOWED to accumulate?”


5 posted on 09/03/2021 9:04:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The heirs want the cash, and who do they sell it to? The big Corporate investors.

But, I invested in three young farmers and got burned by every one of them. One cost me $300,000. Doesn’t meant there isn’t a good young farmer to invest in, just that I didn’t find one. They are as rare as hen’s teeth.

I’d have been better off to align with a big farmer.


6 posted on 09/03/2021 9:08:05 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Biteme’s version of “You didn’t build that”.


7 posted on 09/03/2021 9:15:22 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

The wealth exists because private citizens build it. The govt builds no wealth, it consumes it, usually wastefully.


Not completely true. Govt and even lawyers are needed to build wealth. It is the proportion that is the issue.

But the bigger question is “What is wealth”?

Is wealth a bunch of digital currency?

It is not a simple answer, in fact it is a philosophy, a way of thinking.

IN the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smiths “simple answer” is wealth generates more wealth. That may sound non sensical if you don’t have a thinking cap.

But the simple fact is one generation builds the wealth, the next might maintain it and the third spends it or consumes it. We are consuming the wealth of prior generations and this allows for many stupid decisions.

Nothing changes till the wealth is gone..............


8 posted on 09/03/2021 9:18:41 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Everyone could achieve wealth in America before the decadence of Western Civilisation afflicted the USA and half the US population succumbed to it.


9 posted on 09/03/2021 9:28:08 AM PDT by Savage Beast (“The soul…is ever contented. The…ego...is never satisfied.”--Paramahansa Yogananda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Left hate's private owned businesses, but they love Corporations since that allows avenues to government ownership; see Nazi Germany, USSR, CCP, Venezuela, etc. Old Marx believed in Corporations since they are a form of a Trade Union. The only recourse SMBs have is as follows:

a. Liquidate the business to cover the tax burden.

b. Convert to an S Corp and keep shares within the family and appoint board members from among the family members. This will shift the tax burden to capital gains, however Biden's capital gains tax changes will increase the burden based on qualitative means instead of quantitative ones, meaning ridiculously high capital gains taxes. This second option is temporary as the tax code changes will make it too expensive to hold stock.

Endgame here is to smash capitalism entirely and cede all ownership to the state, e.g. Communism. Guess we should all have really taken McCarthism seriously, huh?

10 posted on 09/03/2021 9:31:08 AM PDT by Intar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Check


11 posted on 09/03/2021 9:54:46 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Allowed? Everyone has the right to pursue wealth.


12 posted on 09/03/2021 12:46:28 PM PDT by The Unknown Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson