The Chau paper is the Oxford study. And the Oxford study doesn’t talk about unvaccinated people, or “the pre-vaccination era”, or anything like that. It just doesn’t.
I might be wrong, but I’d bet serious money that this Dr. McCullaugh guy is deliberately spreading misinformation. It’s the WHO I can’t figure out. They are citing the Chau paper when talking about a comparison that Chau never made.
Anyway, I think you and I have hit an impasse. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
Be safe!
LR
Before you go, consider this....
The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.
The 'pre-vaccination era' numbers are a known quantity.
The current 'leaky vax' numbers are a known quantity.
It is not necessary for the Chau (Oxford) paper to make the comparison. You or I could make the comparison if we saw the numbers with our own eyes. And we're just two guys sittin' in a chair.
Defense rests.
#GoodTalk
China owns the WHO, doesn’t it?