[bagster]

Now that you’ve brought it up, I find something very curious here. The WHO is relying on that Oxford study. No doubt about it. But as I noted earlier, those researchers explicitly mentioned that they are studying vaccinated people only.

Okay, check out the bolded part.

On Feb. 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.

Where's the lie?

[Leaning Right]

The Chau paper is the Oxford study. And the Oxford study doesn’t talk about unvaccinated people, or “the pre-vaccination era”, or anything like that. It just doesn’t.

I might be wrong, but I’d bet serious money that this Dr. McCullaugh guy is deliberately spreading misinformation. It’s the WHO I can’t figure out. They are citing the Chau paper when talking about a comparison that Chau never made.

Anyway, I think you and I have hit an impasse. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
Be safe!
LR