Now that you’ve brought it up, I find something very curious here. The WHO is relying on that Oxford study. No doubt about it. But as I noted earlier, those researchers explicitly mentioned that they are studying vaccinated people only.
Yet the WHO talks about “the pre-vaccination era”, which is nowhere mentioned in the Oxford study. Did the WHO just tack on their own opinions? Or are they also misrepresenting the study? If so, why?
Are you old enough to remember that old game show, ‘Liar’s Club’? In that show a panel of celebrities made statements to contestants. Most of the celebrities were deliberately lying. The contestants had to spot the one celebrity who was telling the truth.
We are all now living that game show, and in more ways than one.
Okay, check out the bolded part.
On Feb. 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.
Where's the lie?
Can't argue with you there. But I'll take the opinions of independent researchers and experts over bought and paid for Government socialized medicine every day.
If I had'a pick.