Replies

> Stop picking nits... <

The author of this article flat-out lied when he said that the study compared vaccinated people to unvaccinated people. The study in fact compared the prevalence of different strains of the virus.

Maybe everything else he said was spot on. But one lie throws everything else into question. It doesn’t matter what the topic is. Liars cannot be trusted.

Side note: I am vaccine neutral. And that’s because I think we are being lied to on all sides. And unfortunately this article is just another example of that.

The author of this article flat-out lied when he said that the study compared vaccinated people to unvaccinated people. The study in fact compared the prevalence of different strains of the virus.

You've got to stop listening to the other vaxtards on this thread. They have an agenda and a vax to protect.

The guy didn't lie. Read this, from the article.

On Feb. 11, the World Health Organization indicated the AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 63.09% against the development of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. The conclusions of the Chau paper support the warnings by leading medical experts that the partial, non-sterilizing immunity from the three notoriously “leaky” COVID-19 vaccines allow carriage of 251 times the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 as compared to samples from the pre-vaccination era in 2020.

'Pre-vaccination era in 2020' means UNVACCINATED.

Therefore, the study compares vaccinated with unvaccinated.

Case closed.

These people (vaxtards) will say ANYTHING to protect their vax. Facts mean nothing to them.