After initially reading the study, I don’t see anywhere in the study that notes or otherwise shows that T cells are damaged or destroyed.
Wait, now I understand what happened.
The article linked to by the OP links to an article at Natural News titled “Pfizer vaccine destroys T cells, weakens the immune system – study”
- see https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-22-study-pfizer-vaccine-destroys-t-cells-weakens-immune-system.html
The Natural News article links to an article at Infowars titled “Studies Confirm COVID Injections Destroy T-Cells, Immune System”
- see https://www.infowars.com/posts/studies-confirm-covid-injections-destroy-t-cells-immune-system/
The Infowars article notes “Alex Jones breaks down the studies that confirm the COVID injection destroys T-Cells and weakens the immune system.”
Okay, got it now.
Ha! I watched most of the Alex Jones video. He doesn’t know what he is talking about or he is just flat out lying. How anyone could take this man seriously is beyond my comprehension.
If you’re curious here’s the full paper by David Bauer that Alex Jones claims he has read:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext
Despite what Jones claims there is not any mention of killer T-cells in this paper. The paper just compares (among vaccinated people) the levels of inactivating antibodies against the original strain versus the levels of inactivating antibodies against the delta variant.
Here’s a quote summarizing the key finding of the paper:
“Two doses of BNT162b2 elicited ELISA-detected anti-Wild-type spike antibodies in all participants, and NAb activity against all strains, including the three VOCs tested, in all except six (3%) and nine (5%) of 159 participants who lacked NAb activity against B.1.617.2 and B.1.351, respectively (appendix p 2). NAbTs of sera correlated well between Wild-type and variants (appendix p 2; RS>0·82, p<2 × 10−16), as well as between VOCs (B.1.617.2 vs B.1.351: RS=0·85, p<2 × 10−16). However, NAbTs were 5·8-fold reduced against B.1.617.2 relative to Wild-type (95% CI 5·0–6·9), significantly more reduced than against B.1.1.7 (2·6-fold vs Wild-type, 95% CI 2·2–3·1), and on a similar order to the reduction observed against B.1.351 (4·9-fold vs Wild-type, 95% CI 4·2–5·7).”
Note that NAbT stands for neutralizing antibody titres.